Earl Hood

Well as it turns out we actually just fell over the line against the Hawks! This is why I will NOT be taking football advice and any game predictions from some body bulking, Basil Rathbone loving, bogan from the northern outskirts of Melbourne in the future! And you can include Frogs from Perth and pensioners from Burwood in that as well. And long live Prince Andrew, the rightful Duke of York forever!

Think we might be taking him for granted, not me but I include the coach who didn’t give him votes last week. If we lost him we would really struggle I reckon.

Agree with most of that. Gee did Lever actually have a clean possession all day? Tracc and some others need to go back to Chocco’s goal kicking school.

6 Gawn 5 Petracca 4 Oliver 3 Viney 2 Brayshaw 1 Bowey

Yes can’t replace ANB defensively and didn’t do enough offensively. We missed Kosi and ANB’s forward pressure I thought. Hawks moved the ball out of their backline too easily.

6 Oliver 5 Gawn 4 Langdon 3 May 2 Brayshaw 1 Bowie

6 Gawn 5 Petracca 4 May 3 Oliver 2 Viney 1 Spargo

I thought he must have Covid issues, close contact or something?

I was sure the push in the back rule was adopted to protect the man in front from just being pushed forward out of a marking contest so the man behind can just take a chest mark. Had that one wrong on tonight’s interpretation anyway. No it seems it’s more for when some guy has already fallen forward to the ground with the ball and the tackler falls into his back.

6 Gawn 5 May 4 Harmes 3 Jordan 2 Brayshaw 1 Langdon

Yes I was there. I remember commenting to my friend at I think it was the 12 minute mark of the first quarter that “ gee have you noticed we haven’t had a possession yet?” And I think by then Wines ( who we didn’t draft against everybody’s thinking) had already kicked 2 goals! Have I got the right game?

6 Oliver 5 Brayshaw 4 Langdon 3 Weideman 2 Bowie 1 Harmes

The few times I have seen Brown he has always looked like a natural forward. Tall agile, knows where to run and good hands. He has been inaccurate at times and hasn’t been given a second chance unlike others.

Get him down back and tell him he is accountable for an opposition forward! Let’s see how he goes. if he refuses to be accountable in the backline then it’s time to end the relationship. At least we might learn something not just repeating the same thing over and over.

I am saying to trial him at CHB at Casey, if it works then you have a selection option. At the moment he is not a selection option at all. And I just don’t see him making it as a forward but he definitely has size, mobility and clean hands (if there isn’t a fist coming through of course). At this stage he won’t be at the club next year.

Been saying for 2 years throw him to CHB and let’s see what he has. If it worked Petty could return forward. Weid appears to have the tools to play off half back, and it’s easier to play there and build some confidence than be a key forward with limited opportunities and someone sitting off your left shoulder all day.

6 Tracc 5 Oliver 4 Bowey 3 Jackson 2 May 1 ANB

Been saying for 2 years Weideman should be trialled as a CHB for periods at Casey to see whether he is a natural defender and build his confidence, he would appear to have the attributes. Petty forward, Weideman back might be a good combo. Now with injuries we need the option of another tall back.

Who was the comedian who tossed the coin? Quite funny I thought.

Looks like it’s mandatory to smile when you get a decision against you! Ludicrous that’s about four 50’s for head shaking.

That’s a big part of the poor play. The midfield dominance that underpinned our big wins last year just isn’t there tonight. Viney is MIA, Max, Oliver, Harmes and Tracc getting possessions but not working together and not getting back defensively and an undermanned backline is being exposed. LJ, Kossie, Spargo, Hunt really struggling. Hope this is the shocker we needed.

The team must have missed all the AFL memos this week about the focus on time wasting, umpire abuse etc!

Except on the score board but that doesn’t really count in the wash up.

Yes thought it must be my eyes.

Doesn’t look like they had to remove any mature trees that I can see although I haven’t had a look at the Punt Rd side.