faultydet

Wonder what 20 & 27 would get us? Interesting. Thanks evil.

Cannot believe anyone actually thinks that clubs do not negotiate outside of the trade window. Staggering.

Says to me it's a sideshow to placate the moronic masses of their supporter base.

Wasn't it 12, and we sent that to Geelong for Moloney?

If it's the 750k rumoured, our young blokes need to suck it up, and play their asses off to justify the comparison at their next contract. If we are losing games for a finals spot against a garbage side decimated by injury, we clearly do not have lots of players worth more than 750k in it. I'm excited by the potential of many of our youngsters, but it remains Potential, not realised. Only the loss of Oliver would make me weep, as I believe he is a generational talent. Everyone knows you pay more for external talent when you are at our level. Everyone. Our footy department has decided we are entering a premiership window, and as such we can put the medium term on hold, and trade away the early picks. If that doesn't excite the playing list, they are playing for the wrong reasons. Goodwin thinks he can coach us to a flag with the addition of Lever, and other targeted talent. I'm bloody excited about that, and the playing list should be too.

And I have no doubt at all that is the case. It's always a huge concern about out of joint noses when attracting new talent. But it flies in the face of what Lewis was saying, and that's my point.

Thats not the point at all. Lewis tells players to accept LESS, in order to attract outside players who will be best 22 Then you suggest players will be ANGRY, if said new best 22 player takes the money Lewis has been telling them to sacrifice. makes Zero sense at all. We have no defender who is better than Lever at what he does. None. So why the concern?

you contradict your own post D167 Lewis gives a speech saying existing players should accept less, in order to attract more "best 22" players from other clubs, then you wonder if the existing players will be p****ed off, because of the arrival of a new "best 22" player from another club, on good coin? Rethink, and re-post

With all of the supposed high end young talent on the list, we have finally arrived at the point of topping up with the finishing touches to have a dip at a flag. Developing another batch of 18yr olds probably wont get us into a grand final in the next 2 or 3 years, whereas adding 2 or 3 very high end talents in areas of weakness just may do that. We were always going to end up having a dip, and sell the longer term future for a solid crack at the now. I'm comfortable with paying a reasonable price if it means a flag. We would all quickly forget the price while enjoying a month long bender following that flag win. If our young blokes develop the way we hope, the time to go after the best is now.

Jesus Ding. Judds Granny follows a very well worn path of a new poster popping up at seasons end, and giving juicy tidbits that people love to swallow, and being exposed and disappearing 2 months later, never to be seen again. Like the posts for their entertainment value, imagine "wouldn't it be great if it were actually true", but don't ask questions and give the impression that you believe what he is saying. Its fun, but nothing more. edit: and watch for the trade rumours to get even more enticing, and complicated at key "bars open" times, friday night, and weekends.

Exactly what I was thinking, only I couldnt remember the name.... boy oh boy

Then Petracca would want to have a consistent season, and not just patches of promise. Just a tad overrated on output thus far is Christian.

I think I would speak for some on here when i say I DGAF what other teams need. Only us. I guess thats why people say what they do.

If you are going to post during trade season, you will need a much thicker skin that that. Harden up mate, and post away! If Norf has actually upped its offer to Martin to 10.5 over 7yrs, they must have given up on Kelly. Welcome to the Dees Josh.

Rumour season has begun. Don't let them put you off @SFebey, some of the best times on here are when we are discussing trade rumours. Only thing that gets my cranky up is when the inevitable moronic trade suggestions come up. 3 x krap for 1 x champion Large or small, true or complete BS, I say bring 'em on.

I'd play for University for $1.5m/7yrs Tigers wont win a flag with the current list. If he wants success, he needs to lower his eyes a bit, and settle for the 3 story house in Toorak, instead of the whole building at Eureka Tower. I'd be very interested to hear the rumours re: the offer to Lever. @Redleg? @Chook in Perth?

Go to the AFL site. No to the dogs.

Haven't seen enough to even guess how good the kid might be, but I have a question. Who is going to mind the Danihers, Browns Hipwoods of the world? If Lever is an intercept marking player, who will shut down the skyscrapers?

Dont be grumpy Nash. The reason it almost never happens is the players use the leverage to almost always get to their desired club

Being out of contract gives leverage to get to your desired club. Threaten to go to anyone, or sit out the game, sook, spit dummy, carry on. Luke Ball?

What happened to the much vaunted "War Chest" that was rumoured to be on standby? Yes, we need to pay our young talent appropriately, but if other teams with much stronger lists than us can afford to pay their guys, why can't we attract a high profile star? All talk it seems.

Maybe he will be happy having his grand final every year for the Pies at the 'G' on Queens Birthday Monday?

Imagine what Taylor and co could make of that in a ""Superdraft"" Mind boggles.

Probably a better suggestion, and closer to the mark.

Im lazy, but where did the 800K figure come from? If that is the missing piece that lands us a flag, it's worth every penny/draft pick.