Jump to content

Diamond_Jim

Life Member
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Diamond_Jim

  1. Diamond_Jim replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Kick Straight and Prosper
  2. Hope they rest Brown Absolutely no reason to play him at Casey at this point. McAdam is a tough one as he could be in line for the Carlton game. I'd give him three quarters. Need better input from the midfield or it will be a wasted game for the forward guys
  3. Very good point. Many posters lauded May for keeping Franklin goalless without realising that Franklin was merely running May to the flank out of the hole and thus opening up their forward line. Hope we play smart
  4. No it we've had much higher crowds... Round 21 2000 = 76,059 ( I was there) Round 8 1963 = 83,518
  5. Agree... the MFC band wagon is not rolling and Saturday night is not a big crowd night. 50k will give us a decent return but 70k would be so much better. Looking like a cool but low wind and no rain evening
  6. Diamond_Jim replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Money and length of contract.... Ask Jackson and possibly Petty The upside is that even if you fail you hobble the existing side with a higher/longer contract
  7. Diamond_Jim replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Another draw would be nice
  8. Excellent point. Security of tenure for assistant coaches is very low. On this basis alone they should be paid extra to allow for the time to transition to another job
  9. Diamond_Jim replied to Travy14's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    In simple terms you have to look at our best 26 and say who is bottom 10. Then you ask is he a better player for a particular role than someone in the bottom 10. If yes... go for him I'd be disappointed if the recruitment team have not got a secret spreadsheet where this exercise is applied to every bottom 10 across the league. You can easily add in the "gettable" factor when you've identified your targets to determine the prime targets.
  10. If you want that then you offer North the deal they should have got for Tasmania. All home games played in Darwin and all away games in Melbourne with Melbourne based NMFC members given normal members entrance rights. Training facility in Melbourne for five years before team and admin relocated to Darwin. Long term location to be reviewed at say 7 year point to consider cancelling Melbourne away game advantage based upon finances, crowds in Melbourne and on field performance. This is how the Tasmania team should have been introduced. Given North played 5 or 6 home games in Tasmania anyway the introduction of a hybrid approach was a great intermediate step. Not sure Darwin would work given airfares and limited connections but longer term who knows. If you want to think outside the box a soccer team based in Darwin competing in the Indonesian League might also be viable. The other SEA leagues are relative minnows
  11. Membership numbers are so fudged these days they often mean nothing. Free 3 game memberships given to Tasmania for example in return for Tas Gov't money. (We probably do the same with NT). Child members etc. The only true guide is attendances. Corporate box use is another guide. Many companies elect to close their box for a lesser game.
  12. The big clubs make big money and are getting tired of being held back by the competitive balance issues tailored to low earning clubs. Say for example they upped the soft cap by 100%... not unreasonable. North could not raise it. It would require AFL money
  13. Had not thought of that but obviously true. Of course they could introduce another Mickey Mouse Round.
  14. Diamond_Jim replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Adelaide, Carlton and the Suns winning (along with us) would put a nice break on the 7-12 group. GWS may as well beat the Swans given that the Swans will be in the mix for positions 2-5. Tigers could upset Freo but I doubt it. If Dogs lose to the Hawks Bevo won't see the season out I'm prepared to cede top spot to GWS for the present. They do us little harm if they are a break away number 1. The next 6 weeks will see some important positioning for the post bye run home.
  15. Whatever slight niggle Chandler has with his knee doesn't seem to be going away given his personalised training program
  16. Definitely worth listening to... Thanks for posting
  17. the interesting thing is the seeming acceptance that the VFL is not an adequate space for gaining match fitness by best 22 players. Really need to question the continued dumbing down of the VFL as a competition. I've no idea of the solution but post pandemic when the competition was eliminated it has gone downhill. Is it time to scrap the VFL?
  18. Diamond_Jim replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Detroit got 700k visitors for NFL draft week. No wonder the AFL salivate over how to hype it up. I wonder why the NFL fans attend? Watching grass grow or a long dental appointment spring to mind but obviously I'm missing something https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2024/apr/27/nfl-draft-day-three-attendance-record-broken-saturday-detroit
  19. Geelong have the Suns in Darwin on Thursday 16 May. A brutal game. Knowing Scott he'll rest half his team. Very sensible
  20. Diamond_Jim replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Now it's AFL owned that deal is not a requirement any more. Just an excuse
  21. Diamond_Jim replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    They carry on about servicing their Melbourne supporter base as well. Mind you a few MCG games against GWS would see them saying we can no longer cater to that base. Geelong have for a while carried a lot of clout at AFL headquarters
  22. Diamond_Jim replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I really thought North would be more competitive this year given their drafting, Larkey etc. Something is amiss perhaps
  23. Diamond_Jim replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Two reasons: They make the same with a crowd of 70k plus at the MCG The football dept wants exposure to the MCG (The answer is for Essendon and Carlton to make the MCG their exclusive home venue and then there would not be room for Geelong)
  24. Diamond_Jim replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    They'll never do that simply because the AFL can't handle a bad news story. Ten years or so ago they had the opportunity to lay down minimal solvency rules etc. for clubs to meet ten years later. The problem was GCS and GWS would have failed them. Melbourne clearly has at least two teams too many as evidenced by the need of four teams including us to sell home games interstate. Docklands with its roof closed policy due to TV coverage has become a dark hole for daytime football Nah they'll admit the 19th team and then say supporters are clamoring for a 20th team so as to eliminate constant byes
  25. Diamond_Jim replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Definitely.. In the USA foundations/investment funds are enormous. We just have to resist the temptation to dip into capital as distinct from income. Magpies have a decent investment fund as well