Jump to content

Sydee

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Sydee

  1. How is that relevant now that he has returned from injury and not performing I just don’t think you can promote a guy who is struggling to impact at VFL level If he kicks a few goals and puts some serious pressure on the opposition backs when he hasn’t got the ball now that’s a different situation - unfortunately that isn’t happening
  2. Well you’re not alone there
  3. If Hunter goes (which he shouldn’t) I’d put McVee on the wing he was far from our worst last night
  4. Struggles to get a kick at Casey but I guess it must be easier at AFL level Not sure why people seem desperate to promote a player that isn’t in form and seems incapable of making a contest and chase when not in possession Plenty looked slow last night and you want to add potentially our most immobile player - struggle to see the merit in this
  5. Not ready imo
  6. Pretty pathetic that he gets fined for demonstrating a bit of personality and humor. AFL - talk about the fun police!
  7. Huge blow this one as he is without doubt a crucial player in our structure
  8. Geez I'm now kind of relieved my betting account has only 15 cents left 😀
  9. funny show - unfortunately wouldn't be allowed these days
  10. Is this a real person or someone they hope to recruit in the mid-season draft
  11. Fair enough - I was not criticising Hunter simply saying which position I would target if I was JJ - which I'm not As you correctly highlight other positions on the field are a low probability for him to get a regular spot in the absence of injuries
  12. For me JJ's best chance is to somehow push Hunter out and play wing - I'm not being critical of Hunter but if I'm JJ that's the spot I'd be looking to take
  13. My comment was heavily biased toward each players ability to contest in the air and on the ground. These qualities are clearly what the coaches value and reading between the lines it is the reason both are playing at Casey. You call it lazy and unfair I call it accurate. I don’t like criticism of our own players and usually do my best to avoid that however I believe it’s fair to say BB’s best football is now behind him. Not saying he will not be selected again but he needs to demonstrate some improvement in the areas mentioned to warrant selection.
  14. You can only work with what you have Not many will agree with me but if Petty goes back into defence I really believe the best options to replace him are are fit TMac đŸ€ž or Joel Smith
  15. Sydee replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Will Powell has to wake and look in the mirror every single day - I think that’s punishment enough
  16. Sydee replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Could it be that this is what happens when lawyers get involved? Apologies in advance to any of our learned friends on Demon land
  17. short attention span 😃 ? or do you think one of them is strong in contested ball situations. btw not sure this contested ball stuff if legal anymore
  18. Not sure about that I think there is more to it Our lack of talls in the F50 that can physically compete and bring the ball to ground remains an issue. It probably explains in part why we are so keen to make sure a 6 gamer doesn't get suspended for something that wasn't reportable. Its not like he has been kicking huge bags of goals - its the work he's been doing to compete hard which has kept him in the team. Consider this Schache - not great at physically competing in air or ground IMO BBB - see above TMac - seems to be laboring with some sort of injury or just terribly out of form Joel Smith - injured and only just now coming back and according to @titan_uranus is not smart enough to be a forward (sorry mate couldn't resist) Fritta - not really a contested beast JVR - will he play? - does compete well but he is a 6 game player and will struggle if gets defender #1 each week Matt Jefferson - a long way off being ready Given the above we have done pretty well to date - having Petty in the F50 has helped IMO not sure how things would have panned out if he had stayed back
  19. Hmmm and how exactly have you landed on that assessment?
  20. After May went to King and with Petty forward, they were always going to get a mis match on Casbolt. Neither of Turner or Lever can match Levi in strength or aerially In hindsight Tommo may have had been a better match up for Levi but overhead he isn't that great IMO In the end Casbolt's game was probably in line with his career average - maybe one goal extra Turner is a good player that will improve we just need to give him a better match up in future
  21. Sydee replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    If I was the AFL (thankfully I'm not that stupid) I'd be more worried about allowing someone like Paddy McCartin back onto the field with his clear history of vulnerability to concussion - seemed like a very big call at the time and in hindsight perhaps not a good one
  22. Sydee replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Quote from Will the Dill “It’s widely covered now that if you make contact with the head and don't make contact with the footy, you're going to be in a bit of trouble. “I think the MRO is doing a really good job of staying on top of (these incidents) which is perfect. “He didn't make contact with the footy, didn't have eyes with the footy and smacked Charlie in the side of the head. “I think he got what he deserved, the MRO is doing a good job.” Now compare the pair 1. Not watching the ball (tick) 2. No contact with the football (tick) 3. Smacked opposition player in the head (tick) 4. Seems he didn't get what he deserved (tick)
  23. Sydee replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    For someone not watching the ball he did remarkably well to get a fist 2 mm away from it - uncanny actually
  24. Sydee replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I assume if we lose this appeal we can just get rid of contested possession as an AFL stat going forward. Closest to the ball just gets possession. I assume after that players will be able to chase and tackle? Is tackling contesting? Oh, it's becoming a bit confusing.
  25. Sydee replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    There was no concussion here