Jump to content

Young Blood

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Young Blood

  1. I reckon we'll bid on Ashcroft here Then pick Langford obviously
  2. What a dream to be picked by the club you grew up supporting
  3. Come on Carlton take Draper! Then Adelaide pick Langford so we can get JAGGA!!!
  4. North took every bit of the 5 mins. Would have been interesting the trades offers that were coming through.
  5. Did Bo fly over? Seeing Draper in the house but haven't spotted Bo Allan yet.
  6. lol don't think it said anywhere that the actual picks started at 7. Just that draft coverage started at 7pm.
  7. Looks like they're going to waffle on a bit longer this year. Last year was around 20 mins in from memory.
  8. I've come around to Lindsay. The keys to why Taylor will likely draft him is based off of what we need and what Taylor looks for. We need players who are more point of attack by foot. Lindsay has the vision and skill execution to be damaging with his disposal. I think this is the key point of difference between him and Travaglia. Taylor likes to draft players like Lindsay who can impact on bigger grounds like the MCG with their run and kicking penetration. I remember in 2019, Taylor mentioned in the draft room when we had just picked Rivers "Kicker/carrier player there, he's an MCG player". I think Windsor fits this bill and I think Lindsay does too. He could even develop into a high HF role down the line if he improves his endurance and pressure. A bit of flexibility there.
  9. Young Blood replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    damn
  10. Young Blood replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    THIS I'm still holding some hope. Would be a terrific ploy on our part to make one of Jagga or Draper available.
  11. As mentioned in the Phantom Draft thread, there could be some games being played by our draft team. A lot of mention of our interest in Tauru for pick 5 or 9. This might be to spook North into just keeping pick 2 to pick Tauru. Would be a terrific ploy on our part to make one of Jagga or Draper available. Crossing fingers and toes this is the play and we end up with one of those two jets.
  12. Young Blood replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I'm not sure if you've seen the argument for Langford in terms of the speed issue. That is he has a very similar profile to Cripps in terms of his game and body. Ran a very similar time trial to Cripps and Bont. But both of those two were able to develop a bit of burst pace to drive the legs out of stoppages and be damaging mids. I can possibly see Langford getting to those heights one day. Thats the argument for. HOWEVER. I am actually with you. I'm going to be a bit disappointed picking up a big slower mid when the top 4 have so much talent, pace and dynamics that we desperately need. Unfortunately it looks as though the mids we want will be off the board by the time we pick. Still hoping North coughs up and picks Tauru at 2. leaving us with one of the best 4 mids left to pick. Hoping for a Jackson type scenario where North just simply wanted him badly enough as the main bolter.
  13. Young Blood replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I am a bit confused. In Cal's scenario where its unlikely North trade the pick and go with a mid. He mentions there's a chance if it rolls this way an alternative is Crom pick Langford instead of Draper. Wouldn't that mean in his draft scenario that Draper would be on the board for us to pick? I'm probably reading too much into this but I thought a simple 'if the crows pick Langford then Melbourne would look at taking Draper'. Instead, he says Tauru would be our next option. I know he does go on to say in the unlikely event one of the top four mids slid we would take one, so maybe he's covering this there. But still. Interesting... Edit: Just saw Dee Boys post above. Didn't realise multiple sources are saying we're not into Draper. Still hoping its maybe some smoke and mirrors!
  14. Young Blood replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Looks like we're really into Tauru if North doesn't pick him.
  15. Young Blood replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Feeling tad bit of relief knowing Reid and Armstrong look to be out of our sites (hopefully!) I think both have a good chance, with development to be great players in the future. But as Taylor keeps preaching you go best available and neither of these two players look like top 10 picks.
  16. Young Blood replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    If FOS is on the board at our pick I'm ALL IN! He's my favourite player in this draft I think he's the most special player in it. An all rounder with some x factor. I think he's such a great mixture of inside/outside, great marking, creativity, vision, footwork and evasive skills. He has so many tools and the athleticism we need in this current team and upside to lead the club down the line. I had conceded he was going to go top three and beyond our reach. Maybe I shouldn't get too carried away with today's rumors...
  17. Woops sorry video was posted Wednesday. I only just saw it pop up on my phone. Please ignore. Apologies. I also meant Twomey didn't* mention Hotton as a Melbourne option in the latest video.
  18. Gutted that he won't play the first few games. I put him in our top 5 most important. We don't have many players I would easily refer to as 'ruthless'. Opposition genuinely fear him and worry about his impact. I'm going to travel down to the Cattery round 4 to hopefully watch him tear them apart.
  19. If thats the case it hasn't got to Twomey yet. He didn't mention him today as an option for Melbourne in the latest 'Gettible' update on the AFL website.
  20. Would happily take Draper off their hands if that happens!
  21. Young Blood replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Pleased to hear this. It seems that North are now looking more unlikely to trade pick 2, but still why would JT be so forthcoming in public saying we're drafting mids? Would it not be more beneficial to say we're open to drafting any position (i.e. maybe even Tauru ;) with our pick 5 so North doesn't take that chance and stop exploring a trade and take Tauru with pick 2, leaving us with more midfield options to choose from with our pick?
  22. As evident with your posts in this thread you're not keen on Jagga with pick 5. Perfectly fine. Keen to know what your preference is at pick 5 and pick 9. Perhaps a few names in order of preference.
  23. In some ways it would be as I believe in many other draft years that Jagga would be a pretty clear no.1 pick. As he was for a lot of this year on draft boards. To get him at pick 5 would be incredible. I really hope North doesn't call whatever bluff's we have going and they end up standing firm to hold the no.2 pick so they nab Tauru with that pick. If that happens we can be more confident that Jagga will be in our sights at 5. Crossing fingers and toes.