Jump to content

binman

Life Member
  • Posts

    15,222
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    96

Everything posted by binman

  1. Fair point. But I think they are playing different roles. Smith is more s defensive forward.
  2. Sorry to disappoint you chazz. But your initial comment still doesn't make sense. In that comment you imply a correlation between looking forward to Joel Smith playing and our chances of success in 2020. No such correlation exists and no one has suggested it does. Except you. Your above explanation (ie we dont agree on his ability) is a completely different point.
  3. I hope not. Or hope so. I'm not sure. Gunston? Clues: A key forward (are correct to assume a big?) Victorian club But not pies And not membrey or Bruce A club who needs to shed some players or $$ this trade period Would be a surprise
  4. Sorry, but that doesn't make sense. Or at least doesn't to me. I am very much looking forward to Joel Smith returning from injury. I think he will be come a very good addition to our side if he can stay fit. But i (and i assume others who share that sentiment) am not suggesting Smith's availability is a prerequisite for success in 2020. I think it will help but that's just hunch. Smith may not even end up being in our best 22, might do or may not shake the injury curse. Whatever the situation ends up being with Smith, i'm still confident of making finals in 2020.
  5. You think before you think, before you think before you think? Cool. One question. Given the above how is it possible for you to post so much rubbish? Think x 4 before responding.
  6. No he's not.
  7. Agree. I think forward is his go with his ability to impart aerial contest and bring the ball to ground and speed to be a defensive forward threat. Can also be swung back in defence if there was a match up problem (eg an opposition playing a small forward line - in that instance May and Smith might swap)
  8. I get the question marks but i really feel like smith could be a best 22 lock and potentially a real star. Has x factor, is super athletic. It goes without saying much depends on injury but fingers crossed he can put those woes behind him.
  9. Brilliant post from a poster called rumpole!
  10. Add giph of the opening of The Twighlight Zone here
  11. Foot speed is important in so far as a team needs one or two really quick players, but more as an attacking option. And as has been noted by some posters there is different types of speed - burst, 100 metre sprints and speed over say 300 metres. But agree the need is over played a bit, particularly for the wing role Tomlinson will play. Agree that we struggled badly on that wing position to cover opposition switches etc last season but whilst poor positioning and structure might have contributed I think the key issue was our lack of fitness and elite endurance runners. Funnily enough (Given he is a key forward) i think this was really exacerbated by the loss of hogan who ran hard up and down the wing. ANB gets a game because he is one of few players who has the endurance to cover that outside lane and the area between rhe arcs offensively and defensively. Conversely gus's lack of fitness was exposed in that position (on that i suspect rumours of him carrying an injury last year and that being the reason he did not play as a pure mid are true). Also agree that Tomlinson represents terrific value for us. Good pick up. The fact we have not had to give up any picks or players is more than just icing on the cake. It is huge as it helps us in this trade period and potentially means we can draft a higher pick than if we had to haggle for him. Great posts on this topic deanox by the way.
  12. Blimey, that's a steep price. Terrific player but 25ish and has only played 2 seasons.
  13. Surely pick 3 gets it done for Kelly?
  14. I wonder if the rumour re listed to Cox but the destination club was muddled. I don't want Cox (leave it alone ds)
  15. Do you barrack for the dees? Serious question.
  16. I hope he tries that against us.
  17. What about the detective and gaff for pick 3?
  18. Gaff, in my view, is precisely the player we need. Given his age i wouldn't give up pick three. But gaff and their first round pick (14?) might get the deal done?
  19. I have no idea and have zero inside info. But I have this funny feeling our pick 3 is a big factor in terms of other clubs wanting/needing it. West coast need something to land Kelly. Would 3 and maybe a pick coming back get gaff? No need then to include Brayshaw in the mix.
  20. We're elite in that stat.
  21. Why not go the whole hog and call us The Gosh's paddocks
  22. A huge factor for goody. make no mistake goody is following the hardwick path in terms of game plan (very similar, though of course not the same) - forward of centre, contest out, get the ball forward at all costs, chaos entries inside 50 etc - and the critical importance of having the the right culture.
  23. Exactly right PSD. Add two elite endurance runners who can provide switching options offensively and gut run defensively to cover opposition switches and tic tac options. Combine with a list that comes back six weeks earlier, has fewer surgeries and players in rehab and gets a high percentage of sessions under their belt and get the miles in the legs. Equals a completely different team able to prevent easy opposition ball movement and transition and run out quarters and games.
  24. They're referring to this site.
  25. He's asking for urine? Strange. Maybe that's we're trading him.
×
×
  • Create New...