Everything posted by P-man
- 
	
		
		Anyone for cricket?
		
		I'm amazed that Crown denied them entry. They had just won the Ashes ffs, what's the world coming to? If I was running the door I wouldn't care if they were rolling in. Perhaps there's more to the story.
- 
	
		
		Anyone for cricket?
		
		Never in doubt, titan Sweet, sweet victory. Now for that rubbish footy team of ours to turn thIngs around in similar fashion.
- 
	
		
		Anyone for cricket?
		
		I would be a lot more nervous if they were only 3 down heading into today. Given Bell and KP pretty much threw their wickets away after getting themselves settled, that could've been a real possibility. We absolutely should get the job done now, especially with Broad on one foot, but you never know in this game. Prior is horribly out of form but is capable of making a big score. Good to see the poms finally showing a bit of fight, but it's come far too late me thinks.
- 
	
		
		Anyone for cricket?
		
		What a morning. I'm still shaking my head in disbelief. 134 runs at 8 an over. The Watson dismissal is one of the most comical things I've seen on a cricket field. Junior cricket stuff. Very Watson-esque. 28 run over from Bailey. Equalling the record set by Lara. And then, after all that, Cook goes for a golden duck off a Rhino jaffa. Hard to top.
- 
	
		
		Anyone for cricket?
		
		I agree it is being used better, particularly by Clarke. It was also noteworthy that it was Watson on the right side of the Root dismissal. He typically hasn't had the best relationship with DRS. Perhaps they have kissed and made up. I'm still open to a restriction on the number of times it can be used in an innings in order to meet the original intent, and please get rid of these stupid no ball reviews for every wicket. One of the great things about cricket, indeed sport in general, is its imperfections.
- 
	
		
		Anyone for cricket?
		
		Regarding the Root decision, I can only assume that the noise registered on snicko created enough doubt that Root may have hit it, therefore the on-field umpire's decision is upheld. The fact that the ball appeared to have passed the bat seemingly wasn't enough. There obviously needed to be NOTHING on snicko and NOTHING on hot spot to be deemed conclusive. I also heard that supposedly hot spot isn't reliable in extreme heat? Which would make the whole thing even more farcical. I agree that there should always be a place for the fundamental of cricket that is benefit of the doubt going to the batsman. Perhaps they are also accounting for respecting the on-field umpire's decision, and only overturning when it is beyond doubt that a mistake has been made. I'm beginning to think DRS is more trouble than it's worth and maybe the Indians are onto something. It was there to overturn the howlers, but instead has become a mechanism of review for any decision where there MIGHT be a chance of a wrong decision, no matter how slight. Basically it is being misused, which was perhaps inevitable. I think the number of times it can be used should be restricted further, but that's another story.
- 
	
		
		Anyone for cricket?
		
		Just watched the highlights of the Windies. Holy hell, they are in some strife. Houses being knocked over left right and centre. Just not acceptable at test level. On the flipside, Boult looks an absolute beauty for the kiwis. Added to his performance with the ball by taking one of the best plucks at point that I've ever seen.
- 
	
		
		Anyone for cricket?
		
		In general or in the context of how the poms have been batting?
- 
	
		
		Anyone for cricket?
		
		Full credit to Haddin. Stood up when needed throughout this series.
- 
	
		
		Anyone for cricket?
		
		Pup gone. Hm, we may have a match on our hands.
- 
	
		
		Anyone for cricket?
		
		Sammy is a decent contruibutor in the shorter form of the game (as are alot of them tbh), but I agree he's not good enough at either discipline to be a test player.
- 
	
		
		Anyone for cricket?
		
		There will never be another Chris Martin. "You still watching that black caps game?" 'Yeah, it's nearly over. Chris Martin's about to bat. Aaaaaand it's over."
- 
	
		
		Anyone for cricket?
		
		Does the crowd outnumber those in the field, TD?
- 
	
		
		Anyone for cricket?
		
		I agree that the team looks focused and up for the contest from the first ball, but it's also worth noting that England's catching has been abysmal. If they had held onto some at the GABBA, it could be a different story. Right now their confidence is shot. Beefy thinks a draw is still possible. He should probably just keep his mouth shut after predicting a 5-0 whitewash. He may end up being right, just picked the wrong team on the end of it.
- 
	
		
		Anyone for cricket?
		
		Ah, right you are.
- 
	
		
		Anyone for cricket?
		
		I'd say Watson is in perfect form. Makes 50 and then gets out. Sounds like the Watson I know.
- 
	
		
		Anyone for cricket?
		
		I'd be going safety first for Perth. Unchanged lineup. As for England, I'd be giving serious consideration to Anderson's spot. When the conditions don't suit swing bowling he is rendered almost totally useless. I read somewhere that they can recall Onions if need be. Not sure if that's true, but his Durham side won the County Championship where he was the leading wicket taker. Pretty unlucky not to get called up when they are picking the likes of Tremlett and Finn.
- 
	
		
		Anyone for cricket?
		
		Interesting points Bob. So you would select 4 quicks for Perth if in England's shoes?
- 
	
		
		Anyone for cricket?
		
		Got no issue with Brayshaw. It's Slater that gives me the ultimate shits.
- 
	
		
		Anyone for cricket?
		
		I agree Rhino, swapping Panesar for Swann would be an overreaction. The old "class is permanent" applies. Swann is potentially as damaging a player as they have. I wasn't all that impressed by Stokes, but Prior at 6 doesn't look great. It's fortunate for them that he has found a bit of confidence with the bat, finally. Maybe Bresnan and Bairstow for Stokes and Panesar. Admittedly pretty rough on Monty.
- 
	
		
		Anyone for cricket?
		
		At least they look like they might bat the day out. This has been pathetic stuff from the poms thus far and it's unlikely to get any easier for them at the WACA. Mitch might kill one of them on that deck. His spell yesterday is some of the best fast bowling I've ever seen. A candidate for the best.
- 
	
		
		Anyone for cricket?
		
		Anyone who has played cricket from club level upward knows that sledging is part of the game. It's very simple, going back to Nash's original point. Keep it on the field. Warner looked like a dill in that press conference.
- 
	
		
		Anyone for cricket?
		
		Agreed. I notice today he admitted he went a bit too far in his remarks, and that was before Trott pulling out.
- 
	
		
		Anyone for cricket?
		
		Trott pulls out due to "stress related illness" - http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-11-25/jonathan-trott-returns-home-from-ashes-series-due-to-stress/5115796?section=sport Big blow, out of form or not.
- 
	
		
		Anyone for cricket?
		
		TD - that's why I said earlier that I wasn't amazed by this result. Even the poms would acknowledge in private that 3-0 really flattered them. The series was much closer than that, they just had every bit of luck go their way. Anyhow, it's a war, not a battle. Need to back it up in Adelaide. No mercy.
 
			
		
		 
     
     
     
    