beelzebub

He's just enjoying a Brand new day ...

Just playing Devil's.. Will we ever really know in a balanced overview or only just how Tracc perceived it. Without doubt we weren't the best run place at the time. But , and it might sound narky, I just don't really care. He's moved out of my sphere of interest.

Beautiful, a really beautiful thing... We've got a Melbourne too a good guy runs that place. You have golf courses right ?? Casey...( turns to Vance ) ... get someone on that... do they have Gators there....our Melbourne....too many gators... Hang on... its Bibi again....its always Bibi... Pete...tell Putin we're sending some gifts his way .... might not like them... he does bad things....

Dont want to rain on yours either... but Yraccs frustrations and petulance didn't quite qualify as 'inspirational' There's a reason both were let go...

Book it in Danno... and GC x 2 😉

None so blind as will not see ..

Nice to see some have eyes 😉

Id rate it a B The cards were stacked.. A was never attainable... but imo we haven't done too bad. Yes, confronting for many.... but step back and look at it coldly... it could have been a lot worse... and with draft to come... Still more work to be done.

He's playing clever clogs... You dont want to alert the competition to your plan... they'll beat you to it 😉

else

Asked elsewhere but probably better here. My thinking all along that should we end up with 7&8; that that was never the focus. We've a history of "shopping" picks. My thoughts go to... if the ready-made didn’t eventuate ( and didn’t ) what was/is the secondary target. I'm thinking that our thinking is a player much closer the pointy end. So who would we be looking at at 2 or 3 ??

Strangely I agree... with both your comment AND the one you referenced. Viva Dland

Well... it's been proffered for quite a while that this Club knows Jack !!

So WHO actually IS worth looking at at 2 or 3 ??

Folk are often mis-pidgeon holed here

If you understand the cause...then you'll get they already have.

I truly dont understand the pessimism or obscurity offered up with all those that say ... but the picks are really.. The picks are what they are. Many of the early 'gets' were NEVER gettable. Scrub those players and the rest is what it is. It's the same for most clubs. So pick 7 is still effectively pick 7 for what is pickable

For mine ..yes

Bye

Bye

Aged well Jack.... what a Steele

What ever damage was done to the fabric that cocooned the love-tribe causing the fractures and player grievances ; this was done prior to the new leadership at the club. They're just left to mop up the mess and start to put things back together. Not everything was salvageable indeed like a rose bush the pruning needed to be serious. Yes its a damn shame much of this has had to play out but imho players carry the same responsibility as does stewardship. In life you have to realise it's your life, guard and guide it well. Melbourne can do better and hopefully its underway.

Might well be a bit to this. Doesn't actually disqualify anything to date... but it might have been a ploy. ( just maybe )

Food for thought. Speed in the game is not always, nor limited to the 'speed' of players per se. It can also be everything about players working in unison and making good decisions. Essentially the ball moves because of good decisions ... it invariably goes flying past you the opposite direction when you make poor ones. If King thinks he (JS) can work in what he envisages the 'new' game to be.. well, at this stage what else really do we need to understand. It's a 👍 from me.... ( because I'm sure the FD waits for ppl like me to approve ...😉 )