Jump to content

beelzebub

Life Member
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by beelzebub

  1. I meant what club.. but I get your gist.
  2. Freos stance was one. Supposedly our 2 Deal was always in the middle. I'm not sure our rhetoric was any more than that. The club wanted/wants a suitable outcome... whatever gets there is the required from Freo.
  3. Nupp. 8 years is fools territory. He won't stay on any park for a full season next year or any coming. Strange days.
  4. Spray him with Bacon ....bacon makes everything better
  5. TB3
  6. Bloody hell the whole things taken a right turn around a roundabout the wrong way heading to Bizarroville !!! Too many involved been drinking their own bathwater.
  7. Agree...smells like total bullshlt eh.
  8. Who is his right mind would sign an 8 year contract these days.
  9. He's succeeded...we all think he's an absolute ( insert word of choice )
  10. beelzebub replied to Chelly's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Freo make Nuff Nuff look like accomplished tomb raiders !!
  11. beelzebub replied to Chelly's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Farce and AFL....well known to each other
  12. Melbourne isn't really looking to keep Hogan. We could just as easily suggested he just play out next year etc. But no he's on the trade table. Discussion about the "price" is part of the game, not so much a "fight" in the sense of "hands off our Jesse"
  13. People actually watch it !!! wow
  14. It's a bit like a bag of crisps...more air than potato...there IS actually only about 2 days of trade....just , it's spread over 10 !!
  15. had looked at it a number of times ...that said i just didnt take note of the extended days to swap picks. Is that new for this year ?
  16. i think its part of any may deal if happening... so until Neale;s done and Hogan done..may isnt done...and neither is KK...I think...lol
  17. hence my thinking there's other things exchanged
  18. ah ...see this is where I tread with caution..... Complete Sense....and the AFL ...are not exactly bedfellows !!
  19. illuminating...wasn't aware of that....interesting
  20. is it implicit that they CAN tackle the sec they over step ? Im not aware
  21. true dat
  22. but surely a play on must be called ? if a kicker was tackled before that..would it not be a free ? I just kinda see a murky area here
  23. last i understood you werent in charge.. did i miss the memo
  24. whats the problem? quite simple....we wouldn't have him for very long before it all goes deja vu
  25. tic.. ... ... toc.. ...