whatwhat say what

True But my MFCSS says JVR being ‘made an example of’ is a fait accompli

Firmly believe it’ll be straight to the tribunal, so starting at 3 weeks

Filth gonna win another thriller?

he was late to the contest, he hit the body / head not the ball, his eyes weren't on the contest it's minimum 2 weeks i suspect but more likely to be 3

post-clearance possessions are how we generate play, not clearances per se

jvr is looking at weeks i reckon

yeah can't agree with fritsch out whatsoever sideshow bald, hibb make sense as 'ins', and happy for spargo to come back in, but no idea who for at this point

ballard no concussion - the issue was he heard a 'crack' in the neck

a face only a mother could love and two cousins could produce

6: viney 5: gawn 4: rivers 3: oliver 2: petracca 1: bowey

every neutral watching it that has been messaging me has been saying what a cracking contest it was and that we got away with one then i remind them of all the non-frees to koz in front of goal and they pipe down i thought it was a great watch, if not a nerve-wracking one

cracking game of footy

rivers wtf our backline ball usage has been a MESS

get stuffed dunstall clayton 100% meant that pass

six weeks it is then

they're actually better balanced with just rowell and anderson as the inside mids

it's working

played at the g today for meth coke

trac didn't wanna take advantage - forced to multiple gc17 players caught in possession far more than hunter ever was - nada

hadn't even been brought to ground, handballed it away MAGGOTS

pickett's tackle created that

firstly, they're not a club they're a franchise they are however playing well as a team

may all at sea

kicked it like a defender he won't go back tho cos it was change the structure of the side too much unless one of the key defenders goes forward

koz loves a spin out of a pack to kick a goal