Jump to content

Sir Why You Little

Life Member
  • Posts

    46,461
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    74

Everything posted by Sir Why You Little

  1. Did Wilson write about CS when he worked at Freo or is it just when he has worked in Melbourne?? I get the impression she wants to run him out of town...
  2. as a person with a disability my disdain for this woman has just gone up tenfold.Hope you are reading this Wilson....
  3. Just found this on my facebook travels....Typical. http://www.vexnews.com/2008/09/cruel-age-sports-writer-caroline-wilson-sledges-paralympics-as-not-really-like-sport/
  4. no don't ban them. They can still read the forum regardless & pass on info, if that is what is happening. Let's just see how much cred they have.This is exactly why i don't like seeing posters like Rangey banned from posting for such long periods. He is a passionate supporter who wants to see his club suceed. We need all those people right now.
  5. yes i think this is more the case. What better place to guage feelings than right here.
  6. yes, i have had that alleged thought. Go back a few years, this place was full of tanking & draft pick talk. Who needs a paper trail of emails??
  7. Those tweets above worry me. Yes it is only 3, but there is a truckload of people out there who want us to burn to the ground so there own clubs are unscathed. It is obvious. This looks like it could be the almighty war that makes '96 look like a quiet drink. This is the moment for the club...We have bottomed out. Now with all our strength pulling in the one direction we must climb up. It will not be easy.
  8. The club will respond once the AFL have finished theeir investigation...They won't forget the Haters.
  9. would have been an interesting "sliding doors" moment if Kevin had taken the job considering the last 5 years....
  10. a statement was issued this morning mate. We are no doubt collecting our own case. Until the AFL conclude their findings we should keep quiet but remain wide awake.
  11. no mate. The relentless media attack is designed to sell papers primarily. We must prepare our defence very carefully. Let the AFL finish its investigation then we have a right of reply. The papers can wait.
  12. but Guilty of what exactly?Give the lawyers time to mount our case. It has only been 48 hours since this blew up. The law is grey.
  13. of course. Loose lips sink ships & the other one often used in politics...."sh!t sticks" so choose your moment wisely...
  14. that is unbelievable. Mclardy said nothing like that AT ALL. More evidence Dees...
  15. yes it is. But the HUN effort is as lame as it could get in comparison.
  16. I have just got around to reading the HUN's scoop for today. What a joke!! Talk about feeding off scraps. Keep all this info MFC...We shall rip them all to shreds when our day is granted. The newspapers are now driving this agenda, not just reporting...
  17. exactly...& i have a feeling the AFL know their grey definitionof "Tanking" would not stand up in a court of law. Vlad was still denying "tanking" yesterday from the radio grabs i heard.
  18. but it will. It is a right within this country. The AFL doesn't run everything (yet)
  19. hang in there Jack..Remember the old saying..."Revenge is best served cold"I am suprised at how much CW is allowed to print, paticularly todays story..but it will all be remembered i hope within the 4 walls of a courtroom if it needs to go that far.
  20. I just get the impression the MFC are preparing to take this to court..
×
×
  • Create New...