daisycutter

#23- Rapt #3 - Pizzed Off no middle ground

freudian slip?

you keep forgetting...........FS draft is before MD

dunno, why don't you ask wyl?

Carlton (get scum out of 8) Huge brawl - 10 players reported, suspended, ending any chance of either side making the 8

I didn't see it as defending I thought it was interesting to understand different aspects of the draft process and understand other ways to evaluate it It was just a little snapshot into a specific area no need for the umbrage

goodnessly - you are on a roll, leaving krudd in the dust

oops...straight thru to the keeper

I can't make up my mind between option 1 and option 3

Ok so Rangey Deeluded Go get a room together LOL

Looks like you are like little Johnny on this issue Rangey - the only one marching in step!

I'd say GWS and GCS would consider MFC 90% sure to take JV at 3 if they had to Question then is whether they are prepared to take that 10% risk for virtually no gain If GWS get a top 10 pick in the 17YO draft (other than from us) it might encourage them to bluff

It's not a new rule. They just doubled the penalty that's all Just more window dressing. Will change nothing

I like that - "Buy in or Buggar off" as long as it is followed by "Results or Rack off"

I can still remember the good old days when they had a holding the ball rule and deliberately dropping the ball was incorrect disposal. aaaah.... the memories

how about what do you think his rating should be? 1-3 4-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 >20

Is there any danger someone might tell Colin then?

GWS have shut up shop for the year

Agree OD it is hard to separate two outstanding worthy winners However watching the Olympics and seeing winning being denied by 1/1000 of a second I think we have to apply a countback basis to arrive at a winner On the basis that Rangey posted approximately twice the amount of square metres of raw text in the week than Jimmi, giving him an unfair advantage, I have to declare Jimmi the winner with "Dickwittery". This decision is final and no correspondence will be entered into by the judge (moi).

So what monumental earth-shattering event happened in 2008 to bring this about?

because beamer had exceeded his pointing quota

massage it any way you like but Chip has had a very ordinary year by his standards if you went to games it would be obvious

just when it looked like things couldn't get any worse this year the media comes up with a Walkley special

Both teams looked the same front on especially with the central white stripe The front on look is much much more important than the rear on look for the players