daisycutter

well apart from the poor zooming aspect, i thought it looked dark, blurry and rarely in good focus better than nothing, but only just p.s. i only saw the youtube stream not the live kayo

did everyone think the video stream was nearly unwatchable, or should i be booking into specsavers?

i can pretty confidently tell you that he will either stay or go i got told by a very close associate of his

nothing to say about the maggots, picket? they looked nastier than the casey serpents

gotta be an owl.......there is an owl on both sides

that's the point though......zurich don't want to just blend in, they want to stand out light blue is their real colour.....and they are a major sponsor paying big bucks

at this rate it looks like norf are as good as jeelong or the doggies

i think they are hired mainly on who can tell the best tall stories from the good 'ole days

they have already said they will make up their own rules on number or qrtrs, length of qrtrs, number of players and probably anything else they mutually agree on

57,057

you pretty well answered your own questions, damo

and they all end up on the floor under the seat, along with the left over chips and all the other detritus

wasn't easy for our girls either. trip up to brisbane then the high humidity with slippery ball. probably why they took a half to adjust.

think you're flogging a dead horse here dp. the board has decided the new home is to be in the mcg precinct

they are quoting 80,000 by 2052 not 800,000......still in their dreams, but

goto mfc site, click search, enter 'academy'

do you work for the grand prix corporation, paul?

if they are going to be a chance to win a flag, they will have to learn to play 4 quarters i don't think they have all season

800,000 lol

talk to membership on the phone. i'm sure they can easily find you a reserved seat under cover

just after our 5 new flags. great timing and during the 3 year build we will have completed our list rebuild ready for another 5 flags

ask me at the end of year, but i'd be looking at players who've been around 3-4 or more seasons and little to no chance of a permanent place in the 22 i only propose this if after all the normal shenanigans we are short $100k - $200k and look like losing out. we don't need a full complement of 44 on the list especially when we are now batting quite deep.

if it comes down to $s then all we have to do is reduce the list by 1 or 2 of our marginal players and there's another $200k we don't have to have a full list (fortunately) and we've got very good depth

has to be juice newton.........eh, picket?

not really a programming problem, but an algorithm problem you'd think they'd a least benchmark their modelling output with expert reality checks...aka the pub test there must be a high degree of arrogance at chumpion data to foist this rubbish on a footy-mad public