Jump to content

daisycutter

Life Member
  • Posts

    29,525
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    59

Everything posted by daisycutter

  1. i can't make up my mind on the 50m penalty. it would be very harsh but technically probably there i'd be more concerned on the free kick. i don't see it. it would have to be extremely technical and if that really constitutes a fair free there would be an extra 50 frees given every game imagine a gf where that sort of rubbish was penalised every time
  2. on the phone to gillom probably
  3. 60 free kicks paid (30:30).....is that a record, seems high?
  4. gold medal: umpires Silver medal: swans bronze medal: tigers
  5. wrong thread
  6. gold medal: umpires Silver medal: swans bronze medal: tigers
  7. i meant more the umpiring (i.e. the weird rules/interpretations they are expected to administer) than the umpires per se but i see what you mean with carlscum at +33 and the filth at +23 frees differential for this game not to forget also that carlscm fans think they have already won the flag
  8. thanks to covid, ticketek and umpiring, i very much doubt it
  9. anything is possible in the afl mediaverse, red
  10. haha.....it.s all fake news.......pure fugazi manager putting contract($) pressure on cows
  11. all good. found my 2 guest passes on mfc app
  12. thanks luci, i will look out for any but i haven't seen them before just had a look at membership site which says my membership has a choice of 2 guest tickets or $25 voucher for mfc shop which i don't remember selecting. will ring club tomorrow
  13. and i don't consider an injury as a weakness specifically targetting any player's injury is pizzpoor treat a player with an injury who opts to play the same as any other player
  14. Does anyone know if a home game membership with reserved seat and gfg includes any free guest tickets (junior or otherwise)? it seems to ring a bell, and if so, how does one go about getting them (grand kids want bring along a friend)
  15. have to be the barras wouldn't it?
  16. i think there is some confusion here between 2 issues the rules around what is a reportable offence are based on potential to cause injury the rules around the actual penalties seem to be based on outcome but not potential .....mostly
  17. it's interesting to note that the chicken wing incident had no bad outcome but was still heavily penalised. that is to say that the mro/tribunal normally place more penalty based on the outcome rather than the action and its potentiality. but here the emphasis was reversed. i think the penalty here was about right, but again it begs the question of mro consistency
  18. port adelaide were called Cockledivers, Seaside Men, Seasiders, Mudholians, Dustholians, and Magentas, before settling on Magpies then powa that first one could have easily been confusing, but i prefer mudholians
  19. nah sorry, it's purely a south melbourne heritage culture thing (at least for victorians) no south melbourne connection and there would be no "bloods" the name south melbourne bloods changed to south melbourne swans in 1933 but that didn't mean the nickname bloods disappeared then. people in melbourne up until they left for sydney still knew about the bloods and many supporters still kept using the name.
  20. are they unhappy at their clubs or delaying contract upgrades? if so, yes, i'd be very interested
  21. instead of he's not happy at norf and has put off contract discussions
  22. i'd rather go and get horne-francis
  23. it's gotta be the blues.....after all they have won 8 premierships this year already 🤣
  24. clearly doesn't have to be 2 motions, as can be attested by chandler getting 2 weeks suspension. langdon did hit the back of his head on the turf and thomas was fortunate there was no concussion
×
×
  • Create New...