demosaw

Harvey Langford

Stoked about our 2 first rounders 🔫 🔫. Don’t like that we couldn’t manage to get/keep a late third/early fourth round pick for 100-150 points and have ~20 more (nominally better) players to choose from rather than scraps at free pick 79. But in JT we trust.

31, have you got a dees tattoo too? maybe one of CO13? ’he wanted a 13 but they drew a 31’

And U relocate them to the NT

To be read aloud in Nona’s voice

Highlight was the dribbler against Geelong

We should take best available at 5 and again at 9. We can make do, see who develops and trade for needs next year.

Some people are hard to please. It wasn’t written for us, but to inform the public who aren’t on demonland every day. At least the reporter isn’t making 💩up…

Article in the age this morning highlights funding gap https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/melbourne-s-70-million-funding-gap-threatens-caulfield-home-base-plans-20241024-p5kl3o.html

Sans sheriff

I love the father - son as it provides a connection with the club’s past. Where father - son is a bit distorted: Expansion clubs - no past players so no sons yet. Mergers - twice as many fathers, so twice as many sons. Bastards - mum was a football groupie

Was a bit stiff to miss the votes.