Everything posted by Chook
-
NON-MFC: Finals Week 01
Love your work WCW but I'm sorry to inform you the quality of the crepe paper used in each team's banner does not portent the future.
-
NON-MFC: Finals Week 01
Nice to see the former Melbourne forward line kicking goals 😆
-
Maynard must get at least four weeks
"Thanks mate, that'll be great for my headaches." "No worries - Wait…is that Tom Morris hiding between your couch cushions?"
-
Maynard must get at least four weeks
The fact Maynard failed to touch the ball for me is key. If he had then it would be a smother that had incidental contact. That he didn't means this was a bump and nothing else. I don't care what his intent was - the action was a bump, late, to the head.
- PREGAME: SF vs Carlton
-
Maynard must get at least four weeks
100%. This is one of the few times the Magpies are the smallest player in the room.
-
Maynard must get at least four weeks
Ray Chamberlain would be great. Huge ego, massive interest in the game but no actual bias. Perfect for a role like this.
-
PREGAME: SF vs Carlton
Since you're asking the question let me throw it back to you to answer. I reckon you'll find it happens more often than you think…just not last night which is my point. Players failed to execute to the coaches instructions. Don't hand out homework. Give me the answers to the quiz since I didn't sign up for one.
-
PREGAME: SF vs Carlton
Seems a shame that players disobeyed instruction by kicking to a leading melksham to win the Brissy game then hey? Plenty of times I saw Gawn and other forwards motioning to get the ball in quicker but the player with the ball was indecisive and the moment was lost. That's not coaching that's on the players not executing the plan. Yes we have a plan to minimise damage by kicking to pockets and bombing at times but not all the time. The players lacked nuance in their play and that's on them not the coaching.
- PREGAME: SF vs Carlton
-
PREGAME: SF vs Carlton
That's just not true. Our forward line has functioned well at times this year and when it has it has come with quick entries. I think potentially our players were super-conscious of not letting Collingwood rebound from defensive 50 causing them to kick to contests which make them more likely to end in stoppages rather than pinging out through hands. However that would not have been the intent of the forward line coach. It would be the players failing to execute on the instructions they were given, which would of course have been to take the opportunity to hit a target inside 50 when it presents.
-
Maynard must get at least four weeks
She's clearly given him a zoom and gone hang on buddy I know what you're going to do and let me tell you it's not happening on my watch. Very impressed with Laura Kane so far.
- PREGAME: SF vs Carlton
- PREGAME: SF vs Carlton
- PREGAME: SF vs Carlton
- PREGAME: SF vs Carlton
- PREGAME: SF vs Carlton
- PREGAME: SF vs Carlton
- PREGAME: SF vs Carlton
-
NON-MFC: Finals Week 01
Also need to attack from minute one instead of from the start of the 3rd quarter.
-
NON-MFC: Finals Week 01
The ability for teams to rebound quickly and score goals (against out of position defenders) has been so evidently effective across these two finals. We need to use that as our plan A instead of a last ditch effort in the final quarter.
-
NON-MFC: Finals Week 01
Jeez the blues ability to get fingertip to ball on the goal line is elite.
-
NON-MFC: Finals Week 01
Give me a good Bowey arrow inside 50 and even I'd kick a goal against Carlton. Give Curnow a rainmaker vs Moore and Howe and even he couldn't do a thing.
-
NON-MFC: Finals Week 01
We can't kick goals when we're icy. This team is so timid and "cerebral" it kills me. A bit of fire might actually be a good thing. Think 4th quarter when we had to actually go, and we did.
-
NON-MFC: Finals Week 01
Roo is tiring anyway and IMO is barely best 22. Melksham is a big out but is only good for 1-2 goals per game. I don't care who you put in our forward line anyway. Forwards kick the goals but they don't create them.