Jump to content

rpfc

Life Member
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by rpfc

  1. rpfc replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Perhaps. But it seems to me that he wants to be a forward and we swung him around a bit. His value will only go up ASSUMING he is healthy.
  2. rpfc replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Petty for Thilthorpe hey? I guess my key question would be… Who wins on points? Thankyou Thankyou I am here all period, do NOT try the veal YOU MONSTER.
  3. rpfc replied to rpfc's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    And I thought he was ‘cool’
  4. You saw ‘highlights’ where he went missing?
  5. rpfc replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Jesus. Did you have a ‘petty’ joke all lined up? Tell it to your probation officer then, it’s fine.
  6. rpfc replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Can I make a double entendre joke involving Petty’s name and the behaviour of being petty? Too obvious? Too obvious and I shouldn’t bother? And I should be [censored] up the [censored] until my [censored] is [censored]? Jesus, it’s just a joke…
  7. rpfc replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    No worries.
  8. rpfc replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Yeah, dump it here. But it will cost you… And I don’t want you rocking up to training
  9. Then why do we care about PICKS IN THE 30s!
  10. rpfc replied to Random Task's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Completely bare??
  11. rpfc replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    If we give up all these picks to get ND1, I am certain WCE will give us the 3rd/4th round flotsam to fill our list. I say this because I think that is a concern for some on here for some reason…
  12. I want an apology
  13. Yes, well said. When Taylor says ‘hey lambie, get us up to this pick’ good things happen. what dross is in this thread
  14. We either did this to get into another trade convo or for a specific player and I love when Taylor trades up for a specific player. We don’t need ND27, we need talent. And don’t get me started on points…
  15. rpfc replied to Random Task's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    But the points !! YOU ARE FORGETTING THE 4 COROLLA POINTS ARE MORE THAN THE FERRARI POINTS
  16. rpfc replied to Random Task's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Apology accepted. See people - is that hard? Just apologise to me for your constant indiscretions and we are fine.
  17. rpfc replied to Random Task's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    You should have stopped after “I know it doesn’t work this way”
  18. rpfc replied to Random Task's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    He’s a 194cm, 100kg meathead. So no, not a Fritsch type
  19. rpfc replied to Random Task's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    If we can’t get Sydney to oay a decent pick AND $650k - we may end up paying something of his salary
  20. rpfc replied to Random Task's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    It’s also about game style - our mids are instructed (or they just prefer to) dump the ball long especially when entering the 50. The Pies are more methodical with their approach. Ok don’t think it is entirely to be dismissed- it’s indicative; just have to find out about what.
  21. I know it is an adjustment. We would still have the press but it would give us better looks up forward to our best forwards Fritsch and Pickett in 1-1 situations that may allow us to keep CP5 in the middle longer, or more damaging when he does go forward. Right now, we are defence first and defence last - all I am trying to do is question that ‘last’ bit and for us to lean into our future - McVee and Rivers - the exact same thing we did with Lever and May to win in 2021.
  22. I’m a no, but that’s not really against Jack - it’s more that I want to lean into a new focus on what I will call the McVee-Rivers Standard. Strong counter-attacking HBs, wings, and outside mids who are bold, comfortable with handballing forward, have neat kicks, and provide ‘just in time’ defence - not ‘defence first.’ The difference being that when the ball is in dispute - they are looking to be positive, so that when we intercept - we are off, and when we don’t intercept -we push to block space and get to the corridor. To me, Billings is a front runner.
  23. rpfc replied to Random Task's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    ‘Petracca; next MFC Captain’ is in pen.
  24. rpfc replied to Random Task's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    That’s a good result really.
  25. rpfc replied to Random Task's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I effing hate that gif