Everything posted by picket fence
-
The very, very contentious 50 for Dissent Rule
They arent!! Law unto themselves
-
CHANGES: Rd 06 vs Richmond
- The very, very contentious 50 for Dissent Rule
Kane Cornes bought it up today on the Sunday Footy show, and I would like to see a few more Media personalities bring it to attention ,account to the AFL for the Basket case rule interpretation, opinion, that obviously is judged differently depending on volition and feel for the game.- The very, very contentious 50 for Dissent Rule
The umpires would do well to totally ignore a arms and hands out in frustration and not pay a fifty m penalty. IMV. It may promote more tolerance and therefore respect. The fifty metre penalty against Clarry was a disgrace.- CASEY: Rd 04 vs Coburg
Majak dominated the first quarter but hasnt been sighted in the second. Can a Casey watcher provide some info?- The very, very contentious 50 for Dissent Rule
GOLD! MAY "THE FLAME" burn brightly for the DEES- The very, very contentious 50 for Dissent Rule
Out... this ridiculous showing dissent 50 rule. What is this??? It is the stuff of fifties and sixties schoolyard discipline. A player not even on the mark throws his hands up in mild frustration and gets pinged for 50?? Come on. I understand and agree to have a verbal 50 rule, but this is an outrageous, overreaction. IMO the AFL need to get rid of this blight on the game. Are we trying to take the human element of frustration totally away? Its 1984 Orwellian Prophesy at its finest. What next? DREAM POLICE pinging blokes for facial expressions depicting dissent?? Get rid of it!- VOTES: Rd 05 vs GWS
6 May 5 Petty ( broke a few GWS Hearts) last night 4 Spargo 3 Oliver 2 Harmes 1 Max/Tracc half each Apologies Langdon, Bowser, Kozzy, Viney and others- CHANGES: Rd 06 vs Richmond
Out... this ridiculous showing dissent 50 rule. What is this??? It is the stuff of fifties and sixties schoolyard discipline. A player not even on the mark throws his hands up in mild frustration and gets pinged for 50?? Come on. Happy to have a verbal 50 rule but this is outrageous. AFL need to get rid of this blight on the game. Are we trying to take the human element of frustration totally away? What next? DREAM POLICE pinging blokes for facial expressions depicting dissent?? Get rid of it!- POSTGAME: Rd 05 vs GWS
Um, just a standard scotch n sugar free! Leave the great Shiraz to ur good self and dear old Uncle Bitter🤩- POSTGAME: Rd 05 vs GWS
Leon Cameron?? Um... who cares what he says! Or anyone else!! WE ARE MELBOURNE!- POSTGAME: Rd 05 vs GWS
Which is what this gaumless entity with zero gravitas and questionable history and brevity actually... Are Greater Western Shizens- POSTGAME: Rd 05 vs GWS
Who ya gonna call..... ? GHOST BUSTERS- CHANGES: Rd 06 vs Richmond
BBB is EASILY superior a player to T.Mac or Weeds... none of which.. ah are in any form to speak of so therefore getting rid of sentiment or try hard or anything else... just play our very best side every week BBB IN...EVERY DAY OF THE WEEK!- My 3 word player analysis v GWS
Irrelevant entity- CHANGES: Rd 06 vs Richmond
Yep and I dont give Flying Trapeze if Weeds or T. Mac goes out!! BBB a much better player ..on so many levels- POSTGAME: Rd 05 vs GWS
I thought he was OUTSTANDING!- POSTGAME: Rd 05 vs GWS
Wash ur mouth out! BBB SUPERIOR in every way to these two Comes in next week NO DOUBT- GAMEDAY: Rd 05 vs GWS
PARK OF ORANGE FRIGGEN WANNA NOTHINGS UR SHEEIT- GAMEDAY: Rd 05 vs GWS
Needs to be an INVESTIGATION FREE AGAINST OLIVER IS JUST CONSPIRACY- GAMEDAY: Rd 05 vs GWS
POOR ?? FRIGGEN INEPT- GAMEDAY: Rd 05 vs GWS
What they are doing is having a nice evening supper of Hot Cross Buns and Hot Chocolate- GAMEDAY: Rd 05 vs GWS
Oliver not himself at this stage. Needs to lift- GAMEDAY: Rd 05 vs GWS
Weeds Experiment is OVER Mc Donald next to useless- GAMEDAY: Rd 05 vs GWS
VERY VERY selfish and Weeds will NEVER make it and T Mac is Wayyy past his use by date TWO new forwards next are BBB and either Mitch Brown Joel Smith or Van Rooyen - The very, very contentious 50 for Dissent Rule