Rodney (Balls) Grinter

7 minutes ago, Orion said:

Yes.  He's a good decision maker

And a reliable kick that can repeatedly execute and hit his mark with precision right where they need the ball to be kicked.

Thought Grundies work with the ball inside 50 today was excellent.  He does some really clever stuff.

20 minutes ago, Jaded No More said:

We finally beat Sydney!!!!!! 

Not just that Jaded, we smashed them!

So enjoyable to watch.  That Sydney are such a bogie side for us really irks me.  They are so overrated IMHO, yet often seem to have it over us.

Hopefully today sets the president and the red and blue print for how we beat up on them from now on.

6 hours ago, Phil C said:

All good points but I was at the game and he was so influential late in the third. I remember texting my brother at the break and I just said ‘Dogga’. Massive influence on the result. 

I don't disagree with that either.  He was a massive influence in so far as he did play an integral part in our midfield/centre square team that tore apart the Dog's in the second half of the third.  However for mine, his contribution has become somewhat over hyped in the context of the whole game and the very worthy contributions of others to the game.

It's not apples for apples Re the salary cap situation etc, but our women's team reciently resigned pretty much the whole list bar Daisy (still irks me slightly she's now at Geelong, even though she's also MFC royalty and will be for life in my eyes) on the basis of continued success.  Really hoping we can lock in all of Riv, Kossie, JJ and Co in years to come to build a dynasty and decade or more of flags/ real success for the MGC - that's what's on offer to these guys and I don't think that would be lost on a guy like Rivers.

Re JJ, for mine he's a borderline frindge player at the moment and by borderline, I think he's better than your average frindge player, but still not quite best 22 for us.

But a season is a long time.  Who knows what opportunities may present for JJ to get back into the team, step up to the next level and stamp himself as an undoubted best 22 player for the MFC.

I also wounder if list age profile is an important consideration for the MFC.  I personally think Harmes is currently a substantially better player than JJ as he's bigger, tougher, stronger and IMHO has much the same if not better footy attributes.  But Harmesy is also in an age bracket where I think we would have a glut of players.  If we are to avoid a Hawthorn, Richmond, Geelong age bubble, I wounder if that could make it preferable to keep someone like JJ over Harmes?

16 minutes ago, BDA said:

he takes 3 half marks per game

Not enough spekie bag defenders to launch off on game day!

4 hours ago, Sydee said:

Needs to revisit that third quarter of the GF if you ask me - more about Trac, Clarry and Viney than Luke.

Not saying he isn't a real talent as I believe he is - BUT it was our midfielders that did the damage in the GF.

Agreed + guys like Gus and Gawny, who stood up when it counted in the first half of the third quarter and stopped the dogs ascendancy from becoming an avalanche.

Fritta held his nerve so well under pressure and got us back in the game when we were peering over the precipice.

The difference and mismatch Jackson created threw the dogs midfield off their structures and Jackson's ability to keep moving from the ruck contest and involve himself in those chains was pretty slick, but Clarry, Viney and in particular Trac were absolute beasts in that third quarter. 

That dribble goal of Trac's that set the bang bang bang in motion was amazing and his bursts from the centre square on several occations setup so many of those goals.  There's a very good reason he won the Norm Smith.

Nice work @Big Col.  It's good to see that even AI is on board the mighty Demons.  Having said that, I think AI would probably be on board anything you ask it to be.

I'm not denying that it's a worthy subject matter, but I actually find the so called Chatbot's effort repetitive, fairly vanilla fluff.  While that may be fine and pass for HS type journalism, it's hardly a Martin Flanaganesk from the heart type motivational contextual specific references.

AI may be increasing in its intelligence by some measures, but human it isn't yet - which may be good or bad, I'm not sure yet.

Pure gold (And brown - poos).  Lap it up Hawks fans and eat s**t - you deserve it.

"But there was a feeling on Sunday, playing a club I thought we had a chance against"


"There had already been a flirtation with Richmond, fed by him clocking that his interest in another club got under my skin. Kids can sense unease in their parents, and needling dad is a fun game. It’s also hard to mount a case to a child that, as animals, hawks are cooler than tigers."


"Other fans helpfully chatted away about how it was a long road ahead, told him that losing was character-building. "

“Dad, why aren’t we allowed to go for another team?” 

"So I admitted the truth to him, that the Hawks aren’t going to be good for a while, but when he’s 11 or 12, I’m hoping they’ll be on the right side of the rebuild and stealing some wins. "

I love it!

3 hours ago, whatwhat say what said:

if i had my way i would have every team who we didn't beat in our annual premiership win finish 9th in perpetuity

i don't want them bottoming out; i want them mediocre

9th - 13th.  Finishing frequently around 9th there would be too much hope.  A few 13th position finishes there's a certain hopelessness and reality of patheticness sprinkled in, without getting access to the real quality 'top end tallent' like the Pertracca's, Olivers, Buddy's etc of the comp that will deny them any future A graders.

17 hours ago, Timothy Reddan-A'Blew said:

This is why I'm riding this train on its journey around the 2023 AFL season - not the 'LJ Thing' (he's forever in my memory for his part in Bang Bang Bang); rather, it's the draft bounty.

It's just the reality.

While in a sense I'm not that personal about it with LJ and share your positive sentiments for his contribution to our flag (along with a whole bunch of players who played a bigger part IMHO), I'd also like it if he can provide a good example to others of what it can look like to leave a team with huge potential for imeediate sucess for other aspirants where that on-field sucess may turn to carp and all they are left with is money and living in their 'home state' of birth.

11 minutes ago, Mazer Rackham said:

If you look at his highlights reel it is mostly marks.

Somehow in the the last season he went from Jeremy Howe to Chris Dawe.

He needs a rocket put up him but unless Freo bring in Clarkson or Lyon mid season he won't get it.

Or maybe it's harder to take marks when you're not getting the 3rd or 4th key defender?

Kind of hope the good time continue to roll at Freo.

8 minutes ago, Queanbeyan Demon said:

Best I've seen - in no particular order . . .

• Scott/Tuck/Matthews
• Fitzpatrick/Sheldon/Ashman
• Cox/Judd/Kerr (as named in the granny side)
• Gawn/Tracktor/Choo Choo

Of that lot, only Scott/Tuck/Matthews delivered multiple premierships.

My view is that premierships are all that count. Every player I know off would swap an AA, B&F or BL for a premiership medallion. So on that criteria, Scott/Tuck/Matthews win out with Fitzpatrick/Sheldon/Ashman a close second (Sheldon had moved to the HBF in their second premiership - his place in the triad taken by Phil Maylin.

When Dees pull another flag in six months, Gawn/Tracktor/Choo Choo stand with anything I've seen in 50 years. 

That's quite true.  Cox/Cousins/Kerr/Judd only actually played in the one flag together.  Even though they played in a team that was capable of multiple premerships.  I'd go as far as to suggest that their poor off-feild culture of getting on the gear together was probably the reason they didn't become a great team and win those multiple flags.

Gawn is a much better captain than Judd and that the latter bailed to Carlton soon after the 2006 flag confirms Gawn's value to the MFC was greater than Judd's to WC.

If we win another flag, I think our mids would easily rank as a better combo than the WC one mentioned.

The other midfields that I think would be a more than worthy comparison would be those of the Lions 2000 era, three peat midfield of Voss/ Black/Ackermanis (Clark Keating in the Ruck?) etc and probably the Hawthorn 2010 era great sides, but I can't recall the individual mids they had of such great brilliance Cyril/Lewis/Hodge perhaps although McAvoy was hardly a super star.

2 minutes ago, He de mon said:

Was impressed by the noise the crowd made last night. We didn't need the embarrassing make some noise snippets that come up on the big screen that we used in last years finals.

Calling out the players by number at the start of the game reeked of American sports hyperbole though - absolutely hated it.

9 minutes ago, hemingway said:

Folks have talked about fitness but did you see Petracca flip off the ground, off his back onto his feet. Never seen that happen on the footy field. Now try doing that in the backyard. It is impossible for most of us,  it requires incredible strength and flexibility in the core. That was my highlight. No wonder he is impossible to tag. A raging bull. Once in a generation. Oh, maybe we have two or three once in a generation players. It’s like looking back and saying how lucky you were to see Barassi or all those other champs from those days. We are very lucky to see our current crop of players. 

Not sure if it's quite the same thing, but I've seen Viney do standing front/back flips.  Perhaps a few of our players could make good professional gymnists or circus performers when they retire from footy?

Thought we did the 'tempo footy' game pretty well last night.  Played defensively and slow around the boundary when things were tight and we didn't have the options on, but then flicked the switch and moved it fast when the time was right.

There were alot of times the Dogs tempted us into switching across half back, leaving a few of our players faurly open, but within striking distance of their opponents, but we were smart and didn't take the bait.  Even in at the start of last quarter when we a good 30 points up, we didn't rush any attacking moves and let the Dog's desperation to score play into our hands and pounced on the turnovers and opportunities that created.

When we did attack, I was pleased with our quick ball movement and ability to run back into space.  The number of times guys like Chandler, Spargo, Kossie and even BBB had a good paddock to run into because of our willingness to take the game on at those times was most refreshing.  Loved that long goal of Melksham's that bounced through - he's a smart and more than capable player around goals and his last quarter cameo last night bought back flashes of his 2018 finals series form.

2 minutes ago, BoBo said:

100%. He’s quick and doesn’t seem to have a problem getting the ball, just got to finish off his good work.

Made one bad error in my book, missing that goal after the siren under a bit of pressure.  But asides from that I thought he was pretty impressive tonight.

9 minutes ago, BoBo said:

I’m pretty sure Rioli only kicked 40+ a couple times in his whole career

He played in a few flags though and that probably means much more in the end.

Kossie should take note and sign on the dotted line for the Red and Blue for life!

1 minute ago, titan_uranus said:

Should (maybe) be 1 week. Careless, medium, high. I think the reason Smith gets up is that it was shoulder to shoulder, so the impact actually was low, but MRO will upgrade it to medium given the potential for harm. 

But yes, generally players from clubs like us get made examples of (eg Chandler’s tackle last year). 

So many players from other clubs get off for more all the time.   If Kossie gets rubbed out for that it will be a travesty.

There are players that could (and probably should) get suspended due to the potential for harm based on their actions.  The AFL usually suspends based on actual damage done, but watch the move the goal posts for us.

Time to hire Patrick Cripps lawyer.

Thought Nibbler was pretty good tonight, along with Spargo and Chandler. 

Melksham also more than handy when he came on.  Could have found himself a role as super sub?

So BBB is finished yeah?

4 hours ago, picket fence said:

I like him, reminds me a bit of Chopper Lovell!

I know Kade is looking pretty buff this season, but he needs to get on the weights hard core if he's to remind me too much of Andy.

Chopper was a beast!!

So Kade gets a gig on the ground straight up.   Great reward for effort for the guy.

Really hoping he puts in a good performance and holds his spot.

I'm upping my bid to $2.45 now, in anticipation Chin playing well on Saturday night.

Bulldogs with strong power forward lineup.  Best way to combat them without May is to deny them supply.  Bulldogs have also lost Hunter and Dunkley.  Libby jnr is a year older and not that great the past few years anyways.

I'm thinking we have them covered with without Maysy, without even considering our substantial backline depth and capability, but the job still has to be done, so let's get the first 4 points on the board for 2023 Demons.

Teams on paper mean nothing it's the consistency of winning that counts.