biggestred

haha if they were to get pick 1 as a result of playing rejects all year there would be 17 other clubs go nuts.

I wouldn't worry about it too much. If the 34 get suspended you can guarantee there will be a club sanction.

I think its more a case of asada saying hey, we have all this evidence and we think you did x. If you did not do x, show us where we are wrong.

Players Sourcing supplements themselves doesnt mean they were sourcing wada non compliant supplements!

was always a possibility they would come and ask us questions, given dank was in contact with our doctor and that trengove visited Alavi's chemist. i would hope that our club would handle itself totally differently to essendon - as well as have records of who took what and when. not to mention the fact that we sacked the doc the second we found out he had been talking to dank!

And collingwood fans may be retarded but at least they arent arrogant

Im with sir paul roos on this one. Collingwood may be filth but they havent treated the entire competition with utter contempt for the last 4 years. Not to mention the way they won a certain grand final - its not like they wouldnt have won anyway

its all over twitter. not sure how to share a link here. therell be an article soon enough

theyve agreed to use fill in players apparently.

The narrative sure has changed hasnt it

Be hilarious if the whole list got 18 months And watson and fletcher got 2 years because they played international rules

One thing is for sure - at the end of the tribunal they must release ALL the evidence. The public needs to see how and when the bombers cheated.

If they are so sure they are innocent they should just play!

http://m.theaustralian.com.au/sport/opinion/essendon-must-come-to-the-realisation-it-is-not-above-the-law/story-e6frg7uo-1227215280339?sv=70e0b1b89afddd5b2cb31a50fc968106#.VNqBtquPqK8.twitter

Round 13 AFL - Essendon v Melbourne Highlights:

Great article from caro

When the axe falls it wont be essendons fault of course. As for the afl - saying no is a discussion lol

Honestly theres more spin coming from essendon than from shane warne to gatting. They cant field a team as they dont have enough players because 20 of them are suspended. Because they stand accused of participating in a systematic doping regime. Thats the bottom line. All this other crap is just spin. "We want to protect their privacy" "We'll boycott unless they arent suspended" "We can't play v vfl players because health and safety" (this is the funniest thing ive ever heard. Vfl players arent good enough to play but the drugs we gave our players but we dont know what they were are so safe they cure cancer. I mean, honestly) Anything to make asada and the afl look like the bad guys while poor little essendon havent done anything wrong.

Essendon players will refuse to run out with top-up players during NAB Challenge, prepared to sit out the competition

There's bars in aami park. Surely we could just use one there for post match functions assuming there was nothing on there?

Im not sure its going to be too much of a problem really. The tribunal is due back feb 16 for a couple of days. Im sure it wont take them a whole month to release their verdict. Infact im sure we will have it well before the start of the preseason games.

Why revise it? Its a classic

Problem is when we are meant to play essendon the other 16 teams will have games. Unless we join with 2 other teams and do that 6 quarter thing they did a few years ago

Then theres this little gem St Kilda seeking certainty from AFL that NAB Challenge match against Essendon will go ahead

Stephen Dank says AFL, ASADA 'constructed' story to incriminate him and Essendon Bombers in supplements saga He's got no idea.