![](https://demonland.com/uploads/set_resources_20/84c1e40ea0e759e3f1505eb1788ddf3c_pattern.png)
Jumping Jack Clennett
Life Member-
Posts
2,275 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Everything posted by Jumping Jack Clennett
-
Clarry Act of Sportsmanship against Carlton
Jumping Jack Clennett replied to KysaiahMessiah's topic in Melbourne Demons
I mentioned this in another thread, but it's more relevant in this one. In round 18, 2018 , we were leading Geelong at Geelong by less than a goal with about a minute remaining. The ball was in our forward pocket, and Max Gawn sustained a tiny split on the lip from (another, unpenalised), headhigh tackle. I don't know if a Geelong player dobbed him in , or one of the umps noticed that there was a tiny blood speck on his lip. He was ordered off the ground. Tom McDonald ran up from the backline to compete in the ruck. Geelong won a clearance, and the ball went to Touhy in our undermanned backline,35m from goal when the siren went. He goaled, we lost, and at the end of the season we missed the top 4 by one game. I think it was that game where Dangerfield cheated early on by quietly telling the ump he'd be rucking in their forward pocket, so our guys didn't hear it. They tried to block him, he got the free, and the goal, then winked smugly at Hawkins. The moral?......don't be a good sport to Geelong, Clarrie! (or Collingwood, for god's sake) -
Maynard must get at least four weeks
Jumping Jack Clennett replied to leave it to deever's topic in Melbourne Demons
I don't like his haircut, either. Perhaps Moore does it for him? -
Maynard must get at least four weeks
Jumping Jack Clennett replied to leave it to deever's topic in Melbourne Demons
I agree with recent posters.It is a nauseating article in the HeraldSun today. -
Let's hope we can sing the above on Sat. night. But I like.... "Oh, the premiership's a pipedream, for poor old Collingwood!"
-
This rather feeble verse, is the SECOND, not the third verse.
-
Unlikely scenario! If the Carlton guy got a fingernail to it, he would have desperately gesticulated to the umpire immediately….. not just hoped the routine review would pick it up despite his indifference.
-
We were basically denied 3 goals….. The Neal Bullen “touched”. The obvious front on interference on Smith, directly in front of goal, in Q1. The reversal after Smith’s good mark in front, when Pickett and McGovern jumper pushed each other in the upper chest. Also, but less definite,late in the last quarter Viney was thrown off the ball during a scrimmage in our goal-square. Does anyone know what the free was for, against Oliver in Q4, in our forward pocket?(when he was given a millisecond to move back, but penalised 50 metres for not stepping back fast enough.) Compare that to the non-50 metres when he was retarded in the centre after marking in Q4. It seems we were unlucky repeatedly with 50:50 decisions, so we lost by 2 points and are branded “chokers”, while every Carlton player is a gutsy champion.
-
Carlton belittled MFC about 15 yrs ago after they beat us, saying they were bruise free after playing us. On Friday, their supporters whinged like banshees when Kozzie bumped a couple of guys. Theyd be sorer than us after their lucky win. They “know that they’ve been playing” against the Dees! Theyll suffer against Brisbane with no “ noise of affirmation” influencing the umpires.
-
Spot on, Deever!
-
If he hadn’t been injured, I’m sure he would have done better than JJ on Friday……..though he wouldn’t have been selected, like Grundy.
-
What about the obvious and undeniable front-on contact on Smith 2 yards out from goal in Q1 ! If it happened to a Carlton player , the noise from their fans would have made it impossible not to pay the free.
-
Which second viewing?
-
Are we all on the Giants bandwagon?
Jumping Jack Clennett replied to dazzledavey36's topic in Melbourne Demons
The AFL must really want a Collingwood/Carlton GF. I don't! -
No definite evidence in that footage that was enough to overturn the soft call . Carlton are so lucky so often with adjudications that it really makes you wonder how.
-
Vale Ronald Dale Barassi - Rest in Peace
Jumping Jack Clennett replied to Dannyz's topic in Melbourne Demons
Is Roger Dean still alive? If so, he should come clean and admit that he staged , and that Ron didn't touch him. His dishonesty caused Ron to miss Finals in '63, greatly diminishing our premiership chances. -
Also, Cripps was allowed to stay on with blood dripping from his nose, and on his jumper. Remember that game at Geelong when Touhy kicked their winner after the siren? (?2018 round 1) Max had a tiny cut on his lip(from another head-high non-free), with a minute to go. He was sent off for the blood rule , and Tmac had to leave the backline to ruck. The ball went down there, they goaled, won, and at the end of that season we missed making the top 4 by 4 premiership points .
-
So where do we finish on the ladder. ? Port and Melb both went out in “straight sets”. They finished the home and away above us, so I guess we came 6th(though we were dead stiff to lose each game, and they were killed in both of theirs.) I guess it puts us above Port in the draft selection.
-
My 3 word player analysis V 3 umpires
Jumping Jack Clennett replied to joeboy's topic in Melbourne Demons
17 bad players , hostile adjudication ……….how did we get within 2 points???? -
Vale Ronald Dale Barassi - Rest in Peace
Jumping Jack Clennett replied to Dannyz's topic in Melbourne Demons
Dynamic and inspiring on and off the footy field. -
He got games....which he wouldn't have with us. He started ok, then went back to his usual poor form. I ribbed my Bomber mates about them giving him John Coleman's number!!
-
What about thecMudpies? Have they played in the wet this season? How’d they go?
-
There is a few players doing well that we've lost that wouldn't get a game with us, that are going well else-where. Hunt, Bedford, McInerney, Weideman,....one or two others, that I can't think of. It shows how deep our list has been in recent years.