Jump to content

Discussion on recent allegations about the use of illicit drugs in football is forbidden

Seekers SEECAMP

Members
  • Posts

    104
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Seekers SEECAMP

  1. Putting ther preachers hat on again Slander? I made an observation, which was canned. A sledge? Doubt it! Nasher plays footy. So do you. Don't be such a pussyfoot. If Nasher has cool heels, as he suggests, it should have been water off a ducks back. But I draw the line where we are talking about the comments made about a 6 year old girl..sexually orientated smut..Selwood is a grub and I will watch this unfold with great interest. What you call & I call differ Slander. What I grasp is common decency. What you grasp is your business.
  2. I knew I'd cop it. Why? Perhaps it might have [censored] him off?
  3. Free speech hey Slander? So where the hell do you draw the line? Sledging of this magnitude is just not on. Lucky for Neale, we have some sense of decency on this site or he would really be copping it in the nackers, if you know what I mean. BTW, you were one of the 1st on this site to sook how perverse it was that we were baying for his blood and poor Neale would be jobless. Seekers, we are all trying to argue our point of view, but do NOT cross the line by taking personal shots at other posters.
  4. Sorry pal, youre pretty much alone on this one. Maybe when you grow up & maybe, just maybe (but I seriously doubt it) have kids you'll understand, you peanut
  5. Formerly Spunjy, now mild mannered adult in major metropolitan playground.
  6. Totally agree Jaded. FWIW, being called 'a so & so Jew' and you're not... reckon if you tried you could find a few who may take offence. It takes all sorts. But as for Selwood, if what he said is true, is scum.
  7. Yep..had a look at the stats and quite right BBP. House & land package on Freo.
  8. Their form at the 'G' is pathetic. Unfortunately this year, so is ours.
  9. Fair enough Slander...fair comment..and I totally agree with you.
  10. Sounds like you are in the know, Lord. Interesting!!
  11. What, Neale won't have the final say this week..Slander, he is totally gone!
  12. I am sure Neale would totally agree. Its just a damn shame he is clueless.
  13. Daniher has no idea. After 10 years enough is enough. Windy Hill beckons. If still in doubt Slander, read my previous post.
  14. FWIW, I sense Daniher to be a realist. 10 years as senior coach has exceeded his personal expectations by a mile. Time for him to join an elite company of former coaches who have been there, done that eg; Matthews, Blight..only difference is, these guys have silverware.
  15. I can't accept the level of mediocrity some supporters are perpetually willing to absorb.
  16. Mind you, his apprenticeship creds are already looking better than G.Lyons.
  17. Lets see if Neale adopts the 2nd half tactics against Geelong in the 1st half against the Dockers..and if were up at half time...what are the chances he'll try the 1st half tactics against Geelong in the 2nd half....... ?
  18. Yep, the coach is totally and unquestionably blameless. Just explain one thing...why is it that over Danihers 10 year reign, the players have been able to look like superstars one day, yet duds the next? Our inconsistency with form and fortune (injuries or none) has been the garbage we have had to swallow year in, year out. If you want to go looking for positives, injuries is no place to start. Try '87 under Northey...or that there are only 18 games left. Daniher is out of time ..and out of excuses.
  19. Not necessarily. The way I see it the bonus here is for the assistant coach being given an opportunity to step-up & demonstrate his value to the club, whereas the head coach has failed. If ND goes, there should and hopefully will be a cleanout.
  20. What coaching experience could Michael Voss possibly bring to the table?
  21. The Preacher has had 10 years to get it right. Divine intervention couldn't same him now.
×
×
  • Create New...