Jump to content

ManDee

Life Member
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ManDee

  1. Careful Jesse, I named my second Earl after Spalding you know that Carlton player. gasp!
  2. ManDee replied to Redleg's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Wrong thread red unless he is a lawyer wearing chaps.
  3. ManDee replied to Redleg's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    A lawyer dies and goes to Heaven. "There must be some mistake," the lawyer argues. "I'm too young to die. I'm only 55." "Fifty-five?" says Saint Peter. "No, according to out calculations, you're 82." "How'd you get that?" the lawyer asks. Answers St. Peter, "We added up your time sheets."
  4. ManDee replied to Redleg's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Has she had the operation yet? I'll start with. 1 Morals bypass.
  5. I agree, Jesse will be the better for it. It's a shame he has to take the best defender each week, plus having Freo dropping a player back in front of him. Jesse is a winner.
  6. We have done well with rookies called Aaron. 2003 Aaron Davey, remember him. Edit_ Typo
  7. Haven't you been reading, The No T$ No B$ Thread?
  8. ManDee replied to Redleg's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    It only takes one goat!
  9. ManDee replied to P-man's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Not digital, broken is broken.
  10. ManDee replied to Whispering_Jack's post in a topic in Other Sports
    Pet hate. Sth Africa won by 9 wickets. How are wickets relevant in 1 day cricket? Surely they won within 18 overs. You can lose more wickets and win. You could score 9 for 200 and win against a side 1 for 199 is that a win by 1 wicket even though you lost 8 more wickets? Any mention of wickets when defining a victory in one day matches is anathema. Edit: You can win by runs - if they fall short chasing. Or you can win with balls remaining if successful in run chase or you can win on the last ball. You cannot win by wickets.
  11. ManDee replied to Redleg's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    And at the end of your fast are you planning on changing your name to bacon & eggs?
  12. ManDee replied to Redleg's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Not quite a rechabite.
  13. ManDee replied to Redleg's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    The complete French delicacy.
  14. Most of those photos are of the Essendon board and a goat, apparently Tania was taking notes. McKenzie and Evans have photos of Tania and.......
  15. ManDee replied to Redleg's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Just send an email to PJ. There is a typo in the thank you letter from the club. Las Angeles! My question is, does this make me anal?
  16. ManDee replied to Josh's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Oh yes it is! Edit:- There are tree ways to the top. 1 Other sides get worse. 2 You improve your side. 3 One and two. Collingwood faltering is part 1
  17. ManDee replied to Josh's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    sutra?
  18. ManDee replied to P-man's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I must be a bit dull today BB. Capt? Not the boat? Edit: Typo
  19. ManDee replied to P-man's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    You reckon that's bad, I named my son Earl. After Earl Spalding!
  20. Speaking of Jacks have you seen the WAGS photos? MFC site.
  21. Happy with the Jacks, well most of them but wouldn't mind a few lions instead of Christians.
  22. Love the logic 57 1 There is no certainty that he will fall to us at pick 2 purely on the basis that pick 1 comes first 2 Who do the Saint have that they could trade for pick 1? 3 Do you believe everything you read? 4 If we have 2 or more picks in the top five I expect us to keep the first one. 5 If we use pick 2 we may not pick Petracca anyway.
  23. Not good head below?