Jump to content

Players yet 'claim' a position....

Featured Replies

Posted

I know DB has said that he would like to teach players to play in multiple positions, but there seems to be a lot of discussion about players who haven't cemented thier positions.

There can be many and varied reasons why these players haven't done so yet, e.g injury, suspension :rolleyes:, new to the list etc.

This topic is not designed to 'bag' any players, but to identify which positions people think they might be best in and why.

Possibly alternative positions that they 'may' be suited to but have never or rarely played in.

Successful teams seem to be the ones that have most positions 'settled' and the MFC and DB are at the stage of identifying just that.

Thoughts on any of the players our list are welcome.

Anyway here goes......

Matty Bate - HFF with a bit of time pinch hitting through the middle.

Lynden Dunn - As above.

Brad Green - Play him forward and get him used to kicking goals again. maybe played back at times when we need it.

Paul Johnson - Roaming tall across half back as he did very succesfully against the crows last year in one of our rare wins.

I don't really like him forward as he is not the best kick in the world (far from worst either) but he is strong at contests and never gives up.

Stef Martin - Given a little time he could become one of the 'great' Full Backs of our time.

Brad Miller - If he can get the toughness back into his game like DB assures us, basically play him on anyone who 'needs' to start hearing footsteps :rolleyes:

Colin Sylvia - Midfield.

Paul Wheatley - Definately on the wing. His penetrating kicks in the forward line will be invaluable and with Morton on the other wing our delivery into the forward line starts looking very dangerous.

Adem Yze - Forward Pocket rotating with Sylvia or Dunn if they need a rest.

Cheers

DeeMfc

 

i like where your headed, good posting...however, i think we should use green as a polished midfielder receiving the hard ball work from slyvia/jones/brock/moloney/valenti and running and kicking the ball to leading forwards...like i hope buckley will play...now with TJ gone, this is what i think green needs to do.

  • Author

If Buckley can harness some confidence and polish up his disposal he will be hard to contain.

I saw glimpses of Ju$$ style explosive pack breaking in the game at skilled. Huge potential !!

 

Ive always like Green to roam the paddock of the F - flank..he can come inside when needed or work in space. He has the gumption to get into the corridor when its warranted. Give him space.

Somehwat begrudgingly id stick Ooz in a pocket also. .he can be dangerous on his day..and reality is..just as we dont know when that is..neither does the oppsition!! lol..Id like to rotate some youth through a pocket also

Bate - CHF.

Dunn - HFF, occasionally pinch hitting in the middle.

Green - Natural forward, should be a permanent FP/HFF. Should only be playing in the middle when circumstances dictate (i.e. if we're light-on for midfielders due to injuries, or to mix up the midfield a bit during a game if something isnt working).

PJ - As a best case scenario he could stay on the list as a fringe player, taking the oppositions third tall on a "horses for courses" basis. Probably wont make it at all.

Miller - Might make it as a third tall down back, occasionally pinch-hitting in the forwardline, sort of like a better version of Dutchy. Too one-dimensional to be a permanent CHF, but I disagree with the popular view that he isnt up to playing at AFL level (if Miller's the absolute worst player in your side then you've got a pretty good list)

Sylvia - If his body is up to it, play him in the midfield. Otherwise he'll be a handy HFF

Wheatley - Rotating HBF/wingman

Yze - If he gets a game this year I'd rather it be in the forward pocket. Not fussed, should be gone next year anyway.


I would have thought that after you have come second last with crippling injuries and then have a new Coaching panel, then realistically every position is up for grabs.

There can be no player resting on fake laurels.

Paul Wheatley - Definately on the wing. His penetrating kicks in the forward line will be invaluable...

...and he also has the skills to go the other way, having spent most of his 100-odd games as a defender.

I liked Dunn playing the run with role he did towards the end of the year, I'd prefer green playing HFF with a license to roam into the middle or swap with sylvia.

 

Thanks for the post DeeMfc, getting more excited every hour about the weekend!

Of the players you mentioned I would leave to see Green and Yze play in the forward line. I understand people have reservations about maybe a lack of forward pressure that these two would provide but they are two highly skilled players that can read the play well and combined could chip in with 6-8 goals per game. Our forward line is so one-dimensional and predictable with simply a leading FF.

After watching the Sandy game on Saturday Paul Wheatley needs to play. He is very much a confidence player. He had maybe half a dozen poor disposals yesterday but he found the pill easily. I thought there were 2 or 3 games last year where he was fantastic.

I agree on Martin, even though we are getting ahead of ourselves. There seems to be a bit of a stylish 'x-factor' about him. Would love to see him thrown into it.

Matty Bate agree, more leaning to an unorthodox leading CHF flanker role.

Paul Johnson needs to be loose in defence.

Brad Miller's just got to work out what he wants to be.

Col will be alright. He's just got to sit up straight and fly right.

I don't want Dunn pinch hitting. I want him in the middle of the ground, in the thick of the action. I saw a plenty yeasterday at Sandy. A tough, mobile 192cm mildfielder who has pace and can kick it long and can mark.

All I want to see on Saturday is bodies flying, pressure footy and gut-busting running. Effort and commitment that will make me leave the game satisfied that we did everything to win even if we don't.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Haha
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 212 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Sad
    • 47 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 330 replies