at the time i think i wanted $cully and trengrove at 1 and 2, talia at 11, and then to call the filth's bluff and pick luke ball at 18

i was in the room when whoever it was doing the draft - i'm pretty sure it was vlad - announced that we'd picked 'luke......tapscott'

for about half a second i thought we'd shown some backbone and not kowtowed to eddie

i'm with you @Earl Hood - wanted hurley at 1 in 08 but i think the thought at the time was that we'd gone frawley the year over the forward in jack riewoldt, so it really was a choice btw watts and nic nat

c'est la vie

Poor old Trenners; to this day people are still adding that second "R" to his surname.  It's TRENGOVE.

On 5/1/2020 at 11:31 PM, dworship said:

That's pretty much the answer I thought you would produce. It's taken a while but I have you pegged now as a narcissist.

It's not that I dislike you, it's just that I've struggled to understand where you're coming from.

The latest info (or rather lack of) has been informative though.

I'm not being holy er than thou (Binman may argue otherwise), it's just my nature to question the comments and motives of people who continually try to promote themselves without any substance.

As someone that has judgemental tendencies I'm compelled to question what I see as illogical, sycophantic or narcissistic comments.

Your reply clearly places you in one (or more) of those categorises. 

I re-read the above post and it is pretty blunt and a bit harsh.

You do have a redeeming feature in that you follow the Dees.