Jump to content

The decline of the Footy Show and it's impact on 'footy' culture

Guest
Guest
in General Discussion

Featured Replies

Posted

It could nearly be upon us: the cancelation of Australia's premiere bogan mirth factory, the Footy Show. Yet again, it has been smashed in the ratings by the Front Bar in most markets (though it was pretty close in Perth).

There are reasons for this. A style and manner of presentation that has been pretty much the same for nearly 25 years (with slight changes to the format). The inevitable use by date of most TV programs. Sam Newman's gradual metamorphosis from boorish lad (who at least seemed to be enjoying himself) to the footballing world's version of Walt Kowalski from Gran Torino.

However, and this is something that may threaten the AFL's longevity, I believe that essentially that the show continues to present a vision of Australian society that is far removed from what Australia actually is becoming. 

I will try very hard not to veer into partisan politics and make this about cultural demographics and values. However, the Footy Show STILL lots forth a version of AFL culture which is akin to jocks tripping up nerds and weirdos in the corridor. Take one look at Street Talk and tell me otherwise.

More than anything else, it is mostly loaded with a bunch of 'good ol' boy' types who are mostly white as ivory, ragingly heterosexual (and in some cases chauvinistic), and dripping with plain old  'I was lucky to pass the intermediate he he he' dumbness.

Be anyone from outside those demographics and you would wonder if this game wanted to exclude you of you were to watch the Footy Show off one were to view it as emblematic of AFL culture. Believe me that it was for many years.

Thoughts?

  • Quote
    •  
    On 8/8/2018 at 9:41 AM, Colin B. Flaubert said:

    It could nearly be upon us: the cancelation of Australia's premiere bogan mirth factory, the Footy Show. Yet again, it has been smashed in the ratings by the Front Bar in most markets (though it was pretty close in Perth).

    There are reasons for this. A style and manner of presentation that has been pretty much the same for nearly 25 years (with slight changes to the format). The inevitable use by date of most TV programs. Sam Newman's gradual metamorphosis from boorish lad (who at least seemed to be enjoying himself) to the footballing world's version of Walt Kowalski from Gran Torino.

    However, and this is something that may threaten the AFL's longevity, I believe that essentially that the show continues to present a vision of Australian society that is far removed from what Australia actually is becoming. 

    I will try very hard not to veer into partisan politics and make this about cultural demographics and values. However, the Footy Show STILL lots forth a version of AFL culture which is akin to jocks tripping up nerds and weirdos in the corridor. Take one look at Street Talk and tell me otherwise.

    More than anything else, it is mostly loaded with a bunch of 'good ol' boy' types who are mostly white as ivory, ragingly heterosexual (and in some cases chauvinistic), and dripping with plain old  'I was lucky to pass the intermediate he he he' dumbness.

    Be anyone from outside those demographics and you would wonder if this game wanted to exclude you of you were to watch the Footy Show off one were to view it as emblematic of AFL culture. Believe me that it was for many years.

    Thoughts?

    My thoughts are that there are bigger fish to fry .... the footy show represented in some ways the absolute obsession that people have (or had) with the sport. 

    But that obsession with the sport has dissipated somewhat so the popularity of a show like the footy show loses its appeal.  And it's all to do with the aesthetics of the game ... many people I know now find the sport to be just about the pure winning or the losing.  My view is largely similar. 

    Taking that a step further is that if you're not going to watch the sport with any great passion with regards to the aesthetics why would you continue to watch a show like the footy show?  It's all relative and the connections to me are quite obvious. 

    I've always said that all the things that have a connection to the sport (tipping comps,  fantasy sports,  the traditions,  colours,  jumper,  the tribalism & rivalries,  gambling etc etc) aren't enough to keep people watching wall-to-wall unless the sport is largely aesthetically pleasing as well.

    However,  I'm enjoying seeing the Demons resurgence and the fact that we're now starting to win but the actual sport leaves me cold.  So I now have to watch a team that I love play a sport that I largely dislike.  It's quite the dilemma.

    I live in Melbourne Col and with my work I end up talking to hundreds of different people every month about sports of all sorts.  Footy has taken a huge back seat with regards to the conversations and I don't drive those chats.

    The footy fanatics here and elsewhere will probably see my words as blasphemous but those fanatics are not the problem for me at all.  The AFL is lucky to have them on board ... it's those who are turning away who are the problem. 

    Put another way - if the sport was to be still the spectacular game for all who grew up loving it then a show like the footy show has a great chance of thriving.  The content of the show gets pushed aside if there's an across-the-board genuine love of the sport. 

    But once that love is gone the content of a show like the footy show becomes front & centre (and exposed for what it is in the points that you outlined)

    I can remember a time when the only criticism of footy came from those who weren't brought up on the sport.  And that wasn't that long ago.

    Edited by Macca

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    This is one of the great threads on demonland by a leftist. I don't even know where to start?

    the show winning the ratings is a panel of three white guys with a misoginist leader. 

  • Quote
    •  
    2 hours ago, Wrecker45 said:

    This is one of the great threads on demonland by a leftist. 

    Because of course you aren't allowed to have an opinion unless you are a neckbeard mouth breather citizen of Kekistan.

    Oh sorry. When that happens it's called 'free speech'. 

    Edited by Colin B. Flaubert

  • Quote

    I can understand that point of view to be honest @Macca

    I find that the suburban charm that was the VFL has given way to AFL Inc. The handling of the Essendon doping case, ground rationalization, the ill guided expansion and HQ's overall hubris annoys me no end.

    I still think the AFL needs to take a step back from the ultra masculine, white, lad culture that has dominated it for time immemorial (as it has dominated the Footy Show), I can understand other reasons behind both mediums fall in ratings.

  • Quote

    57 minutes ago, Colin B. Flaubert said:

    I can understand that point of view to be honest @Macca

    I find that the suburban charm that was the VFL has given way to AFL Inc. The handling of the Essendon doping case, ground rationalization, the ill guided expansion and HQ's overall hubris annoys me no end.

    I still think the AFL needs to take a step back from the ultra masculine, white, lad culture that has dominated it for time immemorial (as it has dominated the Footy Show), I can understand other reasons behind both mediums fall in ratings.

    The professionalism has changed the essence of the sport ... I'm just thankful that I saw footy when it was played the way it was for decades.  From the mid 1990's the sport started changing but I'm reasonably sure it was always going to change with the professionalism.

    But I've always been willing to broaden my horizons so there's a stack of other sports and other forms of entertainment that will get my attention.  So,  in essence,  I've come to terms with it all and am not all that fussed anymore Col.

    The flow on effect is that if there's less interest in the sport then the shows surrounding the sport will be on the wane as well. 

    Edited by Macca

  • Quote

    The Footy Show doesn’t have a niche anymore. Once upon a time it was the one stop shop to get team news, interviews and spontaneous slapstick comedy. Oh yeah, and it was one of THE ONLY places to get this. 

    We now have Fox Footy where you can watch 360 each night for news, analysis and interviews as well as On The Couch. There’s a myriad of podcasts available for interviews, analysis, Footy humour, whatever you want in a consumable size. There’s free to air shows like Footy Classified for news, Front Bar for a laugh and a trip down memory lane. The footy show doesn’t fit anywhere. It’s nearly but none of these things. Even if something funny happens on it you don’t have to watch the full show anymore to see it. With a quick google I was able to see Chris Judd’s stupid cancer joke in a matter of seconds. 

    The only chance for the Footy Show to survive is to pull it back to 60 minutes. Times have changed and no-one gives a toss about a 90 minute variety show on a Thurs night. 

    Edited by layzie

  • Quote
    • Like 3

    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • GAMEDAY: Collingwood

      It's Game Day and the Demons face a monumental task as they take on the top-of-the-table Magpies in one of the biggest games on the Dees calendar: the King's Birthday Big Freeze MND match. Can the Demons defy the odds and claim a massive scalp to keep their finals hopes alive?

        • Like
      • 38 replies
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Collingwood

      It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
      The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
      Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

        • Like
      • 4 replies
      Demonland

    • NON-MFC: Round 13

      Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • 216 replies
      Demonland

    • PREVIEW: Collingwood

      Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • 1 reply
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Sydney

      The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and 
 it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • 1 reply
      Demonland

    • REPORT: St. Kilda

      Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
      This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

        • Like
      • 4 replies
      Demonland
    View All