You can't play viney and Tyson in same side, with viney out Tyson fits in the side perfectly, Mitch just does not get the ball, with Jeff and spargo in the side Mitch unbalances the side, Tyson has to play in the guts, he has been played on the outside he is no good on the outside. He will play well this game, need his experience  in the guts with viney out.

Would rather have a fit an in form Kent vs Hannan / Tyson.

Problem is he is rarely either ?

Edited July 19, 20187 yr by Rusty Nails

2 hours ago, don't make me angry said:

You can't play viney and Tyson in same side, with viney out Tyson fits in the side perfectly, Mitch just does not get the ball, with Jeff and spargo in the side Mitch unbalances the side, Tyson has to play in the guts, he has been played on the outside he is no good on the outside. He will play well this game, need his experience  in the guts with viney out.

Tyson invites pressure on the inside as he doesn't have the bullocking break away ability of a Viney.  Viney is a few rungs above Tyson in this regard.  I would even argue that Tracc & Harmes are starting to show better traits in this area also.

I would rather stick with Clarry, Brayshaw, Tracc & Harmes and go with an outside winger / HF.

Kent is the best option for this role when in form vs Hannan / Tyson.  Is also more accurate at goal and on average kicks more goals per match than either of those two (when he gets on the park, which is rare).

Having said that I dont think any of these 3 are long term keepers (Kent a slim possibility of eveything goes right from here).