Jump to content

Featured Replies

On 6/24/2021 at 8:47 AM, Gorgoroth said:

Best bet. Sat Randwick R8 no 2 canasta $4.60 win

@Macca

Canasta is scratched. 
I’ll change mine to Eagle Farm Race 9, no 6 Away game

 
4 hours ago, Gorgoroth said:

@Macca

Canasta is scratched. 
I’ll change mine to Eagle Farm Race 9, no 6 Away game

All races are off from Rosehill and now at Randwick hence Canasta was scratched but it’s still actually running.

40 minutes ago, Gorgoroth said:

All races are off from Rosehill and now at Randwick hence Canasta was scratched but it’s still actually running.

Righto then ... makes sense now

I'd already put Canasta into a 2/3 parlay but the Canasta legs were refunded.  I ended up cashing out the multis so will have to start all over again!

 
9 minutes ago, Macca said:

Righto then ... makes sense now

I'd already put Canasta into a 2/3 parlay but the Canasta legs were refunded.  I ended up cashing out the multis so will have to start all over again!

Sportsbet won’t allow me to cash out the multi, maybe cos it was just out two horses? Anyway, means it really becomes a $5ew bet ?

1 minute ago, Gorgoroth said:

Sportsbet won’t allow me to cash out the multi, maybe cos it was just out two horses? Anyway, means it really becomes a $5ew bet ?

Laddies keep about 10% but I like my multi's to be on my terms so I'll take that small hit. 

Trouble is that Lunar has come into 2.40 for the place (was 3.20) ... so I'll find another along with Canasta to get the odds up.  An all-up place bet might salute

There's plenty of value in Melbourne & Morphettville though.  Waiting on Gator's Randwick tips but there's 3 or 4 shorties so the multi's up there might be the go

By the way, www.skyracing.com.au has all the big tipsters picks from about 9am tomorrow


Lunar didn’t quite get the job done. Canasta once again pipped over the last 50 meters. 
Away game came very late and stole the win.

1 minute ago, Gorgoroth said:

Lunar didn’t quite get the job done. Canasta once again pipped over the last 50 meters. 
Away game came very late and stole the win.

Yeah I just missed on the F4 in the Away Game race ... lean day!  (but still way in front from last weekend!)

29 minutes ago, Macca said:

Yeah I just missed on the F4 in the Away Game race ... lean day!  (but still way in front from last weekend!)

Bugger. I’ve had a small win over all, Zayydani saluted for me, 4 placing bonus bets I’m using some on a SGM in port v syd, got all three goal kickers in the first qtr, now need rampe 15, boak and Lloyd 25. 

 
15 hours ago, Gorgoroth said:

Best bet. Flem, race 8, no 5 the astrologist $4.20

Best Bet Saturday - Flemington

Race 2 No.3 Seb Song (J Kah) 6.00/2.00

 

The double is paying 24-1 (with a boost)

Edited by Macca


Got a couple of late tips. 
Sunshine Coast race 6 number 1 Tumbler Ridge each way

and

Murray Bridge Race 7. No 1,  Just Folk

It was at $9 when he got on it, said it was $6 and I just checked and it’s already into $4. I’m going to hope it drifts back out again.

On 7/1/2021 at 5:08 AM, Gorgoroth said:

Best bet. Flem, race 8, no 5 the astrologist $4.20

Nice one

I had it going in 2 doubles and missed on both!  Still, that's my strategy on these best bets

Get one up and it pays for itself for close on 6 months.  And the small outlay doesn't hit the pocket


16 minutes ago, Macca said:

Nice one

I had it going in 2 doubles and missed on both!  Still, that's my strategy on these best bets

Get one up and it pays for itself for close on 6 months.  And the small outlay doesn't hit the pocket

Just missed the trifecta in the last by a nostril. But otherwise a small profit which I’ll always take. 

On 7/3/2021 at 4:40 PM, Gorgoroth said:

Just missed the trifecta in the last by a nostril. But otherwise a small profit which I’ll always take. 

Reckon I'll start using our 2 tips with 1 other to form a 2/3 parlay bet

I picked up another 3 doubles using the 2/3 parlay method in the UK (over the last 2 nights) to end up in front for the weekend.  All 3 of the other picks all ran 2nd so I could have been swimming in it!

2 hours ago, Macca said:

Reckon I'll start using our 2 tips with 1 other to form a 2/3 parlay bet

I picked up another 3 doubles using the 2/3 parlay method in the UK (over the last 2 nights) to end up in front for the weekend.  All 3 of the other picks all ran 2nd so I could have been swimming in it!

What’s the parlay method?

26 minutes ago, Gorgoroth said:

What’s the parlay method?

3 races with 3 set picks in each race

You then take the 3 doubles within the 3 picks (A & B, A & C along with B & C) as well as the treble (A, B & C)

Any 2 get up and you get 1 x Double ... if all 3 salute then you win the Treble & 3 x Doubles

So 4 bets in all ... I usually split up $25 or $30 in the total outlay (often 8, 8, 7 & 7)

But I carefully pick out the 3 races, not just any old race.  So our best bets can be used in that fashion.  A 2nd chance if you like

If you outlay a total of $30 and if one of the doubles gets up at $8 @ $3 x $4 ($12) then you'll get back $96 (well in front!)

If all 3 salute it's happy days!

 

Edited by Macca

1 hour ago, Macca said:

3 races with 3 set picks in each race

You then take the 3 doubles within the 3 picks (A & B, A & C along with B & C) as well as the treble (A, B & C)

Any 2 get up and you get 1 x Double ... if all 3 salute then you win the Treble & 3 x Doubles

So 4 bets in all ... I usually split up $25 or $30 in the total outlay (often 8, 8, 7 & 7)

But I carefully pick out the 3 races, not just any old race.  So our best bets can be used in that fashion.  A 2nd chance if you like

If you outlay a total of $30 and if one of the doubles gets up at $8 @ $3 x $4 ($12) then you'll get back $96 (well in front!)

If all 3 salute it's happy days!

 

Cheers.

Seems slightly confusing, but I’ll try and figure it out ?


1 minute ago, Gorgoroth said:

Cheers.

Seems slightly confusing, but I’ll try and figure it out ?

A better way to describe it is you use any of the 3 picks in any sort of multi ... but not as single win bets.  Thus, it gets called a 2/3 parlay

And there are a maximum of 4 multi combinations using the 3 picks

But I generally only use races where I don't want to have a win bet because the thing I like is too short in the market and my outlay is too big for a not big enough return

$3 or $4 chances as a general rule

On 7/2/2021 at 5:14 AM, Gorgoroth said:

I see J.Kah need three winners this week to get the most wins. I hope she can do it.

Now down to one for the champion jockey (Jamie Kah) ... on a number of chances tomorrow so much so that I've taken out a one-out Jamie double!

Quietly confident too!  The best bit when doing the form is finding a horse that you like and then seeing that J Kah is on board.

Some of the best Jockeys ride well into their 40's but Jamie is still only a 25yo

In Melbourne it's Kah, Oliver & Williams whilst in Sydney it's McDonald,  Bowman, Berry & McEvoy.  Elite company

8 hours ago, Macca said:

Now down to one for the champion jockey (Jamie Kah) ... on a number of chances tomorrow so much so that I've taken out a one-out Jamie double!

Quietly confident too!  The best bit when doing the form is finding a horse that you like and then seeing that J Kah is on board.

Some of the best Jockeys ride well into their 40's but Jamie is still only a 25yo

In Melbourne it's Kah, Oliver & Williams whilst in Sydney it's McDonald,  Bowman, Berry & McEvoy.  Elite company

I’ll have to have a look, hadn’t checked as zip try and keep my punting to the weekend. 
She is a great jockey and yeah so young to be going so well. I remember Oliver was good when young too but this is next level.

 
14 hours ago, Gorgoroth said:

Just had a look, she is on a lot of good chances early on.

No winners for Jamie today! 

Nevertheless, Saturday awaits where she sits on no fewer than 6 favourites.  Gotta be at least 1 winner there but perhaps 3 or 4

Dipped out on the Jamie double but managed to snag a place double at decent odds.  Back to Saturday's only though ... midweek racing is a raffle!


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 133 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 385 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies