2 hours ago, AdamFphlebeb said:

The McClardy reference is cringeworthy for a couple of reasons. And is he going to get some other sources other than failed past administrators? 

I don't know. If I was editing that piece it'd be a whole lot shorter, to the point that there's barely any.

Glad there's more positive press for the club, but what was the fresh angle with this piece?

Agree.

Meh article.

1 hour ago, Whispering_Jack said:

I think we've covered all of this stuff in the past and there are pros and cons on both sides.

Any danger that we could stay on topic?

The thing I've noticed about this site is that most threads end up bitchy sniping matches...

There are a lot of people around who have tried to lift us but for one reason or another , unfortunately it didn't work. To those in this bracket, I say thanks. Better to have tried, than not tried and the way I see it , that's way more than I or many others have done.

Sometimes you have to have stepping stones to good times.