Jump to content

Land all good?

Featured Replies

computer-problems.jpg

 

Thank you and sorry to put you through that.

Trust me it was no picnic for me and Nasher either.

I actually texted Nasher this morning and said if they can't resolve this then I'm throwing in the towel.

I was very serious.

Now you're just trying to scare us..

Seriously though, well done Nash and co. This site is pretty much invaluable for us out of town folk. Time for another donation me thinks.

You can't see your posts because they were hidden and looking at the moderator notes about you it seems it was a consensus to ban you for life at the time. You also appear to have had two usernames running at the same time which is against the code of conduct of Demonland. Still I am happy to refund you the money. PM your PayPal email address and I will see that you get refunded.

I think you are being deliberately deceptive here. As you would be able to see, I set up a second account (this one) when I was having trouble logging in one time, but never actually used it until you banned me without any explanation, and if you read my posts you will see that I have advised that this is my second user name and the reason for it. I'm not sure how that would be against the code of conduct. As for second user names, I received a warning from the mods for exposing Enforcers multiple usernames, so this does seem quite hypocritical to me.

I also find it interesting that there are moderator notes but no notice or information was passed to me.

If the posts are still there, I'd be interested to see which ones caused the banning, for a life ban with no explanation I'm assuming I must have made severe breaches, used foul language, made threats etc, around the time of the ban??? Surely it would not just be a few opinions that were not shared by the moderators? I'm happy for you to post them here, or message them to me.

I hope you said more than that Thomo and this was just the straw that broke the camels back.

I remember thinking the same thing as you but didn't comment at the time. Although rudeboy help liam and I think he should be credited for that, he is a Collingwood coterie member who organised a interview with the collingwood president behind the MFC back and against the MFC wishes.. It didn't sit well with me at the time as rudeboy being around the AFL knew that he should never have done the interview.

Wolfmother, at the time of banning I had also been posting that Mark Neeld was the wrong choice as coach, and that Cameron Schwab was bad for the club. Many posters, such as RPFC and whatever alias Enforcer was allowed to use at the time, were quite critical of these opinions (now facts), and the mods obviously agreed with them, so I was banned.

Aside from that my posts were generally respectfull, and I believe contributed well to the forum.

Edited by Yourenextdipper

 
  • Author

I think you are being deliberately deceptive here. As you would be able to see, I set up a second account (this one) when I was having trouble logging in one time, but never actually used it until you banned me without any explanation, and if you read my posts you will see that I have advised that this is my second user name and the reason for it. I'm not sure how that would be against the code of conduct. As for second user names, I received a warning from the mods for exposing Enforcers multiple usernames, so this does seem quite hypocritical to me.

I also find it interesting that there are moderator notes but no notice or information was passed to me.

If the posts are still there, I'd be interested to see which ones caused the banning, for a life ban with no explanation I'm assuming I must have made severe breaches, used foul language, made threats etc, around the time of the ban??? Surely it would not just be a few opinions that were not shared by the moderators? I'm happy for you to post them here, or message them to me.

Wolfmother, at the time of banning I had also been posting that Mark Neeld was the wrong choice as coach, and that Cameron Schwab was bad for the club. Many posters, such as RPFC and whatever alias Enforcer was allowed to use at the time, were quite critical of these opinions (now facts), and the mods obviously agreed with them, so I was banned.

Aside from that my posts were generally respectfull, and I believe contributed well to the forum.

My power is quite immense.

And 'generally respectful' - so about 80% respectful?

  • Author

And yourenextdipper/Thomo - if I recalled correctly you were very prone to personalising debates with people and criticising the site and the people that run it.

This place isn't a democracy - it's run by people who have to 'own' the nonsense we put on here.

The quicker posters realise that the more patience and understanding they will have when The Evil Mods Take Their Freedom Away And Treat Them Horribly...


I think you are being deliberately deceptive here. As you would be able to see, I set up a second account (this one) when I was having trouble logging in one time, but never actually used it until you banned me without any explanation, and if you read my posts you will see that I have advised that this is my second user name and the reason for it. I'm not sure how that would be against the code of conduct. As for second user names, I received a warning from the mods for exposing Enforcers multiple usernames, so this does seem quite hypocritical to me.

I also find it interesting that there are moderator notes but no notice or information was passed to me.

If the posts are still there, I'd be interested to see which ones caused the banning, for a life ban with no explanation I'm assuming I must have made severe breaches, used foul language, made threats etc, around the time of the ban??? Surely it would not just be a few opinions that were not shared by the moderators? I'm happy for you to post them here, or message them to me.

Wolfmother, at the time of banning I had also been posting that Mark Neeld was the wrong choice as coach, and that Cameron Schwab was bad for the club. Many posters, such as RPFC and whatever alias Enforcer was allowed to use at the time, were quite critical of these opinions (now facts), and the mods obviously agreed with them, so I was banned.

Aside from that my posts were generally respectfull, and I believe contributed well to the forum.

The case is closed.

If you would like a refund PM me your paypal details.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • REPORT: Carlton

    I am now certain that the decline in fortunes of the Melbourne Football Club from a premiership power with the potential for more success to come in the future, started when the team ran out for their Round 9 match up against Carlton last year. After knocking over the Cats in a fierce contest the week before, the Demons looked uninterested at the start of play and gave the Blues a six goal start. They recovered to almost snatch victory but lost narrowly with a score of 11.10.76 to 12.5.77. Yesterday, they revisited the scene and provided their fans with a similar display of ineptitude early in the proceedings. Their attitude at the start was poor, given that the game was so winnable. Unsurprisingly, the resulting score was almost identical to that of last year and for the fourth time in succession, the club has lost a game against Carlton despite having more scoring opportunities. 

    • 3 replies
  • CASEY: Carlton

    The Casey Demons smashed the Carlton Reserves off the park at Casey Fields on Sunday to retain a hold on an end of season wild card place. It was a comprehensive 108 point victory in which the home side was dominant and several of its players stood out but, in spite of the positivity of such a display, we need to place an asterisk over the outcome which saw a net 100 point advantage to the combined scores in the two contests between Demons and Blues over the weekend.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: St. Kilda

    The Demons come face to face with St. Kilda for the second time this season for their return clash at Marvel Stadium on Sunday. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Vomit
      • Like
    • 111 replies
  • PODCAST: Carlton

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Tuesday, 22nd July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to Carlton at the MCG.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

    • 31 replies
  • VOTES: Carlton

    Captain Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year Award from Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Kozzy Pickett & Clayton Oliver. Your votes please; 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

    • 22 replies
  • POSTGAME: Carlton

    A near full strength Demons were outplayed all night against a Blues outfit that was under the pump and missing at least 9 or 10 of the best players. Time for some hard decisions to be made across the board.

      • Like
    • 317 replies