I cant believe the AFLPA can say stkilda had no grounds to sack him. Are they serious. He was already on his last warning from Watters about a prior incident. Do they think about how the poor girl is going. What he did is a very serious offence. .

Amazing how you guys can be reasonably mature with the Jurrah situation but when something involving women comes up you all turn back into school kids. Grow up.

This involves friends of mine, and these tasteless jokes are offensive and just plain dumb.

I don't know the people involved 'stuie' but always find these types of things sad and extremely difficult for all involved. I can understand the offence you feel to some of the BS here.

I cant believe the AFLPA can say stkilda had no grounds to sack him. Are they serious. He was already on his last warning from Watters about a prior incident. Do they think about how the poor girl is going. What he did is a very serious offence. .

It's about money. They said they had every right to sack/delist him. They're trying to making sure he gets the majority of his contract for next year paid.