Jump to content

Featured Replies

Good hold by the D.

Super nervous now, we are trying to be cute with throws when Gurley should be given that ball.

 
1 minute ago, Gorgoroth said:

Can’t plan for it hitting the foot like that. Thought Peterson had recovered then realised it had squirmed out again... sigh

Both D's playing very well ... turnovers,  fumbles could decide this game.  Atlanta's running game not there and the Rams need to use Gurley more.

If we don’t put a drive together on this next series we won’t win, this is how we went vs a few teams this year where we didn’t get going in the first quarter and floundered the rest of the game and it looks mightily similar to that early Seattle game. 

Falcons are starting to move it a little, we have missed Ryan a few times now and he is making his throws, starting to look comfortable which worries the hell outta me. 

 

Wow 2 muffed returns in the first ... We need a TD here, got to take full advantage of thess turnovers


Cooper looked like he had no idea what to do when fielding that punt then. Normally he picks a line and goes, he looked like a deer in headlights there.

Thank god for Donald and Brockers.

 

Ryan has done well to hang on to the ball - they've come at him hard. 

 

 

This field is horrible. Both sides slipping everywhere


Why they replaced it always seems bizarre. It’s never good. Ever.

Good fight back from my boys. 

  • Author
On 05/01/2018 at 9:54 AM, Clintosaurus said:

And the commentators tell us about it every time Dallas play.

Don't they ever...

2 hours ago, Gorgoroth said:

Smith goes now. Question for me is what sort of pressure now goes onto Andy Reid. They go on these great runs, then slumps way too often.

Philly fans smiling a little smile...

28 minutes ago, JV7 said:

This field is horrible. Both sides slipping everywhere

I saw Freeman early in the game take off to the sideline, pushed out, and a couple of metres over the line is a slab  of concrete that he slipped A over T on. It boggles the mind.

Had 3 opportunities to force a kick and Falcons have got the first down. Gotta hold them to a FG. gotta keep it under one score.  


Was just writing how good the secondary from Atlanta have been, then Wood makes a great catch. 

Atlanta held on to the ball for 26 plays in that 3rd quarter ... playoff experience at work. 


Gurley g3ts us going, That sack cost us a shot at the end zone, got the game back to single score. Need to force a turn over or a quick out, cant let them take it up field and use clock.

So my thoughts on today’s game.

Pretty much everything that worried m happened.

Atlantas secondary were huge, the open field tackling was excellent.

Ryan was pretty good without being great. Played a little safe at times. But when the clutch plays were needed the good players stepped up. Ryan, Julio, Sanu.

to my Rams, Donald was amazing, Brockers until injured was also very good. Really hurt losing him.

Gurley was decent, but dropped so many catches. Woods good, same as Kupp. O line decent. 

Goff was pretty good in that he didn’t panic, hasn’t done stupid things and I think the experience today will set him up for next year. 

McVay I think today was average. Hardly called screens and did not run Gurley enough. He needs to learn from today and from all losses he has so far.

Special teams are usually a strength but they cost us the first 10 points and realistically the game. Cooper has been amazing all year but terrible today and that’s being nice.

 

Falcons can go to the championship game, Philly would not want the Falcons.

 
1 minute ago, Gorgoroth said:

Good year overall for the Rams, disappointing night.

good luck JV7.

Hard luck Gorg... You are right though, have to be happy with the improvements made in year 1 under McVay,  the future is bright. I think the experience helped the Falcons & like Macca said they controlled TOP. Quinn gets the D playing right at the right time of year again. A foles lead Philly next opens it up a bit 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Collingwood

    It's Game Day and the Demons face a monumental task as they take on the top-of-the-table Magpies in one of the biggest games on the Dees calendar: the King's Birthday Big Freeze MND match. Can the Demons defy the odds and claim a massive scalp to keep their finals hopes alive?

      • Clap
      • Haha
      • Like
    • 719 replies
  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Like
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies