e25 5 Posted October 1, 2010 Posted October 1, 2010 That is inequitable. And I doubt we'll burn Warnock just to get Hale, when he is worth so much more.
e25 5 Posted October 1, 2010 Posted October 1, 2010 Much more likely is something like: Freo - Mitch Clark Carlton - Tarrant Brisbane - Walker or some variation of that. Still probably won't happen.
old55 23,860 Posted October 1, 2010 Posted October 1, 2010 That is inequitable. And I doubt we'll burn Warnock just to get Hale, when he is worth so much more. Biased North supporters will be saying exactly the opposite. Both players in an importannt role who are held out of the best 22 by better players - they have the same value.
e25 5 Posted October 1, 2010 Posted October 1, 2010 But Warnock's worth as a KPD is at a premium, while Hale's another ruck, is not.
Disco Demons 92 Posted October 1, 2010 Posted October 1, 2010 i'm prepared to go all in....would happily give pick 14, Maric and Warnock for a first class KPF. ie., could target the hawks for roughead
Red Sox 2 Posted October 1, 2010 Posted October 1, 2010 Trying to add a bit of humour to posts does not necessarily make a poster 'an idiot', appreciate TD's efforts, but personally I wouldn't care if Andrew Walker was traded to the Chicago Bears, I am only interested in the Melbourne trades and I was actually going to 'cut and paste' from the list Da Bears going nicely enough without him!
jayceebee31 768 Posted October 1, 2010 Posted October 1, 2010 Get off your high horse you abusive [censored]. (now I just sit back & wait...) Look whose talking !
e25 5 Posted October 1, 2010 Posted October 1, 2010 Look whose talking ! Well, I had to wait for some time, but finally we have a winner...
sylvinator 96 Posted October 1, 2010 Posted October 1, 2010 Now that Mitch Clark is on the trade table, I am really keen to get him (though apparently he might only want to go home to Perth?). He is a great player, his 2nd half of 2009 was All Australian worthy, playing as a ruckman/forward. He is only 22, 200cm. Basically he is exactly what we need, providing a big target up forward and a 2nd ruckman. And unlike David Hale he's actually a very good player. Adding a player like Clark would actually make us a better team. I propose trading pick 12 and Warnock for him. Would that get him over the line.
Disco Demons 92 Posted October 1, 2010 Posted October 1, 2010 Now that Mitch Clark is on the trade table, I am really keen to get him (though apparently he might only want to go home to Perth?). He is a great player, his 2nd half of 2009 was All Australian worthy, playing as a ruckman/forward. He is only 22, 200cm. Basically he is exactly what we need, providing a big target up forward and a 2nd ruckman. And unlike David Hale he's actually a very good player. Adding a player like Clark would actually make us a better team. I propose trading pick 12 and Warnock for him. Would that get him over the line. i like the idea BUT....i could see us ending up paying to much for him.. we have jamar plus youth...and other teams like the hawks need a ruckman.
old55 23,860 Posted October 1, 2010 Posted October 1, 2010 But Warnock's worth as a KPD is at a premium, while Hale's another ruck, is not. You seem unable to grasp that we want him as anchor forward who can relieve in the ruck, not as depth ruckman and therefore that's how he should be valued.
e25 5 Posted October 1, 2010 Posted October 1, 2010 You seem unable to grasp that we want him as anchor forward who can relieve in the ruck, not as depth ruckman and therefore that's how he should be valued. ? I'm not unable to grasp anything. What designs we have on him are irrelevant when considering his market value. And Warnock is worth a lot more to a lot more teams than Hale.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.