Jump to content

Mock Trades


MadAsHell

Recommended Posts

Posted

That is inequitable.

And I doubt we'll burn Warnock just to get Hale, when he is worth so much more.

  • Replies 86
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

Much more likely is something like:

Freo - Mitch Clark

Carlton - Tarrant

Brisbane - Walker

or some variation of that.

Still probably won't happen.

Posted

That is inequitable.

And I doubt we'll burn Warnock just to get Hale, when he is worth so much more.

Biased North supporters will be saying exactly the opposite.

Both players in an importannt role who are held out of the best 22 by better players - they have the same value.

Posted

But Warnock's worth as a KPD is at a premium, while Hale's another ruck, is not.

Posted

i'm prepared to go all in....would happily give pick 14, Maric and Warnock for a first class KPF. ie., could target the hawks for roughead

Posted

Trying to add a bit of humour to posts does not necessarily make a poster 'an idiot', appreciate TD's efforts, but personally I wouldn't care if Andrew Walker was traded to the Chicago Bears, I am only interested in the Melbourne trades and I was actually going to 'cut and paste' from the list

Da Bears going nicely enough without him!

Posted

Get off your high horse you abusive [censored].

(now I just sit back & wait...)

Look whose talking !

Posted

Look whose talking !

Well, I had to wait for some time, but finally we have a winner...

Posted

Now that Mitch Clark is on the trade table, I am really keen to get him (though apparently he might only want to go home to Perth?). He is a great player, his 2nd half of 2009 was All Australian worthy, playing as a ruckman/forward. He is only 22, 200cm. Basically he is exactly what we need, providing a big target up forward and a 2nd ruckman.

And unlike David Hale he's actually a very good player. Adding a player like Clark would actually make us a better team.

I propose trading pick 12 and Warnock for him. Would that get him over the line.

Posted

Now that Mitch Clark is on the trade table, I am really keen to get him (though apparently he might only want to go home to Perth?). He is a great player, his 2nd half of 2009 was All Australian worthy, playing as a ruckman/forward. He is only 22, 200cm. Basically he is exactly what we need, providing a big target up forward and a 2nd ruckman.

And unlike David Hale he's actually a very good player. Adding a player like Clark would actually make us a better team.

I propose trading pick 12 and Warnock for him. Would that get him over the line.

i like the idea BUT....i could see us ending up paying to much for him..

we have jamar plus youth...and other teams like the hawks need a ruckman.

Posted

But Warnock's worth as a KPD is at a premium, while Hale's another ruck, is not.

You seem unable to grasp that we want him as anchor forward who can relieve in the ruck, not as depth ruckman and therefore that's how he should be valued.

Posted

You seem unable to grasp that we want him as anchor forward who can relieve in the ruck, not as depth ruckman and therefore that's how he should be valued.

?

I'm not unable to grasp anything.

What designs we have on him are irrelevant when considering his market value.

And Warnock is worth a lot more to a lot more teams than Hale.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...