You are a [censored]- Eleven possible changes at the end of 2010. McNAMARA & CHENEY will definately be there. Garland ,unless his injury causes retirement will also be there. I believe there will no more than 7 leave.

Not the talk of the recently banned.

They are all under pressure to not be the 4 or 5 we cut. Pointing out who are the vulnerable is not being 'a [censored],' it's being realistic.

You are a [censored]- Eleven possible changes at the end of 2010. McNAMARA & CHENEY will definately be there. Garland ,unless his injury causes retirement will also be there. I believe there will no more than 7 leave.

You're open to the possibility of seven delistings and yet call someone a '[censored]' because they list eleven possible changes? That makes no sense.

As for the players you think it is so outrageous of RR to suggest are possible departuers, you seem to concede Garland's injury could play a part.

As for McNamara and Cheney, they're kids we picked up with late picks in the draft and neither have cemented a spot in the side.

I don't think we're likely to cut anyone born after '88, but stranger things have happened.

You are a [censored]- Eleven possible changes at the end of 2010. McNAMARA & CHENEY will definately be there. Garland ,unless his injury causes retirement will also be there. I believe there will no more than 7 leave.

I think Cheney is far from a sure thing and is lucky to even be on the list for 2010.

As you keep preaching: everyone is entitled to have their opinion and voice it.