olisik

Don't get to excited about Petracca yet. Remember he had a limited tank when he joined us. Imagine what his tank is now after 6 months on the sideline. He will have a mountain to climb to get his tank some up to AFL Standard let alone learn the game plan, running patterns, improve his skillset ect.

Then how the [censored] are we going to get all these players listed in this thread with nothing of value to trade? That is unless your happy to part with Hogan Brayshaw or Viney

If we get a PP to trade it will help us lure in a big name mid

His manager was on the Sunday footy show today and pretty much said Watts turned down rival offers as he is committed to stay with the dees through thick and thin. Also said that his endeavour to get to contests last week is something the team are working hard on so hope he goes well today

Hope we don't trade him as we don't really have spare utilities to fill the void left

I agree it's weird but I saw some of the play switches and damn he knows how to give our boys space and time to launch and attack.

As to those paying out on Dawes I think it's a bit harsh, the guy works hard and definitely gave us something when we wernt doing too well under the Neeld regime. That said I think he does have value and now would be a good time to see if we could get anything back for him in a younger player which fits our age demographic better.

Iv been saying we should trade Watts for years but last week seeing him play changed the way I think about him. I think he is the biggest game changer our team has. Some of the things he did last week to turn the swing of the game were amazing, no one else in our team has that IQ and talent. No one else in our team can swing a game around like Watts can when he is on

Pathetic post mate. 23 posts in and your already attacking fellow supporters. Go snipe somewhere else mate.

Well someone should have been held accountable for not picking up Oxley as it cost us the game. Roos said the players didn't follow instructions so it seems he has been let off IF he was the spare but that's irrelevant as to wether we should target Aish or not.

I will, Aish 89 career tackles to ToumpAs 55 Didn't you see ToumpAs opponent running into every contest first Last week?

'Sub this year'....this year. Twisting words again. You seem to do a lot of it. If your happy with ToumpAs good on you but I like to aim higher and think we should go hard for the kid to put more pressure on places and improve our outside run.

Congratulations, you can twist stats and you played state. Unfortunately AFL Is different to what you played and if you hadn't realiZed Aish has been sub for a lot of his games this year. Going back Toumps has had just 84 marks from 24 games while Aish has had 91 marks from 3 less games and while being the sub more. Anyone can twist stats to their argument mate, if you watch them both play isn't hard to see who is the better of the 2 and who [censored] up less

To be a successful winger you need to be good overhead as the ball always comes down the line. Aish is much better overhead then the Toump

Aish isn't getting a good run as he hates Brisbane and they arn't playing him because of it. In relation to comparisons to ToumpAs, if you watch Aish play you can see he has the confidence to do some real damage and he also does not have several changers per game like ToumpAs. He has that competitive and confidence that Toumpas lacks. Also we have no other players pressuring Toumpas for spots, he is now in our starting 18... We could get Aish for unders due to the discontent up in Brisbane which would be a good target. WC are cleaning up with Yeo who also wanted out and was traded for unders

Brisbane know Aish is on the out so they don't give him game time. If we could seal him with our 2nd rounder and a Chris Dawes I would take it in a heart beat

But Aish would be getting a better job if signed with us.

We will go for Aish. Mark my word

Gotta say, I find Careys journalism refreshing. Seems to rate a lot of our list highly and always defends them when due. That said if something negative is deserving he also doesn't shy away from saying it as it is.

Touché

always derailing. This thread is about VandenBerg, not PP mate.

Can we not call him VandenFyfe. His name is VandenBerg. Why do we feel the need to slap on the name of a player who has absolutely Jack [censored] to do with the dees. Give the guy some respect

Seeing that Garlett goal makes me think we could almost implement a Hogans paddock. The way he booted it forward and gave Garlett a free run at goal

He smiled in his post match interview. Was loving the crowd

Credit to Mark Neeld for securing this kid.