Macca
-
Posts
16,307 -
Joined
-
Days Won
54
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Everything posted by Macca
-
I'm quite big on history not being ignored. The AFL's team of the century did not include one player who played prior to 1930. In my book that makes it a flawed team. In cricket, we've got all the numbers for proof and let's not forget that batsmen played on uncovered wickets back then. Any batting average above 35 - 40 would have been some sort of achievement. Couple all that with the fact that there isn't a person alive who saw any these past greats (prior to around about 1920) and they can easily be overlooked. All we've got is the history books and the numbers but I trust the accounts of the day. Liked all your teams though TD. Test Cricket has a very rich history. Btw, Victor Trumper only averaged 39.04 but he is widely renowned as one of the greats. Blokes like Macartney, Noble, Armstrong and others had excellent numbers (all things considered)
-
I think we're all getting tired of that lousy excuse that because others doped, it somehow justifies an athlete cheating themselves. It's a cop-out and it doesn't cut it with me. All these individuals make a choice. Though we do know that some 'teams' have doped, as a whole, I still can't blame the sport or the tours. It's not like all the thousands of volunteers and organisers of the Tour de France wanted all this. On the contrary, they're most probably all dead against doping. It's a shame that innocent athletes are getting tarred with the same brush. It's unfair. Here's the latest from the arguably the biggest cheat of all ... Armstrong: U.S. Postal Service got 'what it bargained for' I've got my fingers crossed for a truthful and just outcome.
- 520 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- 2011 winner cadel evans
- go any aussies!
- (and 4 more)
-
Yeah, picking that best XI was good fun. Doing it over January was ideal as well. The BBC lads along with Jim Maxwell picked a best Ashes XI and this is what they came up with (in batting order) Jack Hobbs Len Hutton Don Bradman Wally Hammond Allan Border Ian Botham Adam Gilchrist Shane Warne Harold Larwood Dennis Lillee Glenn McGrath 12th Keith Miller I would have had to have found a spot in the XI for Miller but who do you leave out? Here's the write-up ... The greatest Ashes XI
-
Here's a bit of Thommo for ya TD! It's a pity he hurt his shoulder a couple of times as he could have gone down as one of the all time greats. As it was he certainly left a lasting impression. We were a good side prior to the 74/75 season but with Thomson added to the mix, we became a great one. Btw, Dave Warner is now 110 not out. You'd reckon with that knock he might get a recall.
-
Yeah, some excellent teams there TD. I'd only make a few changes with the bowling (Thommo and Garth to swap with Merv and Billy) but you've done well with the rest of the line-ups. Monty Noble and 'The Big ship' Warwick Armstrong would find their way into my XI's as well. Charlie Macartney was another player with strong claims. You'll be giving HT some more ideas about 'Best XI's ! (which passes the time nicely in the Holiday period whilst we're all watching the 'Big Bash' )
-
If you look at our team, we don't seem to have a lot of natural leaders. We are coming off a hugely successful era filled with strong characters and self starters. The last few years and probably the next couple of years are very similar to that '83 to '88 era. Even though I'm generally against picking older blokes, I think we could do a lot worse than to bring George Bailey into the side. If we were to revisit a past player, Marcus North might also be a good fit for what we need right now. Both Bailey and North are highly regarded for their leadership which is what we so badly need. Clarke would have a couple of 'Go to' men along with Haddin. It's time we got a couple of new young batsmen into the side as well. We've got to bite the bullet at some stage. Of the current 8 batsmen in England, only Clarke and possibly Khawaja have long term futures. The others have huge question marks over them. Many of them have had enough chances (Rogers excluded) and it's time to move them on. Our current batsmen's ability to play spin is diabolical. We're tentative, there's a lack of footwork and we're missing too many straight balls. Katich is about to turn 38 and along with Punter and Hussey, he's had his time. Wouldn't surprise me if they called on him though. North is still only 33 and bowls reasonable off spin. Bailey is 30.
-
Tactically, Clarke is excellent. As a batsman, he's world class. As for leadership, it's so hard to know. He cannot be blamed for our current state. If you're representing your country, you've got to be naturally motivated and if you let the backroom stuff distract you, you probably shouldn't be there. Character comes from within. Our lack of performance with the bat is part technical and part temperament. The rest of it is up to the player himself and there are no excuses.
-
Yeah well I grabbed that mirror, peered over my shoulder and all I could see was the towel rack! Seriously, all that back room stuff doesn't really interest me. We've no idea what's really going on anyway. Everything we hear about is 2nd and 3rd hand news so what are we supposed to believe or not believe? There's a lot of rumour and innuendo and I don't give it a lot of credence. The easiest way to judge things is to simply comment on what we see out on the ground. We're not much chop and that can't be disputed. All the selectors can do is to give others a chance and see what they come up with. It's my belief that we need to rebuild with youth (21 - 26 year olds) but I wouldn't be against a short term rescue plan with a couple of wise heads so that we can at least be competitive. But talk of bringing back retired greats comes with it's own issues. They've had their time. It won't be getting any easier any time soon. After England visit our shores we embark on a tour of South Africa to face Steyn, Morkel and Philander. I wonder if the selectors will go outside the squad to strengthen the current team? Obviously the Australian A team who are playing in South Africa could offer up some candidates. But in reference to the captain and coach, every player is responsible for his own actions. Batting, bowling or fielding for the team still remains an individual act in this sport. There's very little a coach or captain can do once you're in the moment. Oh and TD, I like that team! You had to leave out a few champs ... Punter, S Waugh, Grimmett, Benaud amongst them. Thommo 'live' was astonishingly fast. He was a freak with an almost perfect high release. Scary quick and at his best, was almost unplayable.
-
If Watson goes then 4 or 5 should go before him. Faulkner can't bat in the top 6 and Watson will probably stay because of his bowling. I agree that Watson should go but right now, he is better value (all round) than Rogers, Hughes, Khawaja, Smith, Cowan and Warner (none of whom bowl ... Smith bowls occasionally but is a real part timer) With Patto out we will need Watson's bowling even more so. Watson should drop down to no.6 for now as he's not an opener and we could replace him with Henriques or Mitch Marsh (but probably not whilst we're in England) How the other batsmen escape the same scrutiny is astonishing. It's a team game and it's never one persons fault when a team is playing as diabolically bad as our team. I'm not excusing Watson as he should be dropped but so should all the batsmen (bar Clarke) We've got far bigger fish to fry. Rogers adds nothing and is too old, Cowan the same, Hughes is back to his non productive ways, Warner should have been sent home, Smith isn't up to it and Khawaja can't go on with it. If Watson goes, so should the lot of them. Sacking Watson on his own won't solve anything and we'll be down to 4 bowlers (without a strike bowler - Patto) Faulkner is a no.7 or no.8. He is not a test standard batsman.
-
Yep, hangin' out for the season to start. Think cable covers a number of the practice games (not sure about OneHD) Anyway ... this ESPN Doco has been screening on ESPN in the last few days but I noticed it's been posted up on Youtube. Interesting to look back at how Elway was a huge prospect in baseball and how the draft was 'tested'. Also made mention of a League that I'd never heard of ... The USFL (United States Football League) Both Elway and Marino came out of the same draft and this is their story ... 'Elway to Marino' http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HqrM7KzByQ
-
Larry David with one of his rare interviews ...
-
Ha! Is it being broadcast on the net or on Eurosport? Was trying to find an image of Froome with the actual Tour de France trophy but had no luck.
-
An audio podcast from the final day ... Chris Froome is crowned champion For a comprehensive summary ... Froome: champion of the 100th Tour! Congratulations to Chris Froome .. a worthy winner and just far too good for his rivals. It's been another fantastic tour. Marcel Kittel, Peter Sagan and Nairo Quintana also excelled during the great race. Fabulous viewing.
- 520 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- 2011 winner cadel evans
- go any aussies!
- (and 4 more)
-
The last day ... Versailles / Paris Champs-Élysées. The stage begins at about 1.45am and finishes at about 5.30am (our time) Stage 21 ... live coverage from the official site Jean Francois Pescheux's view ... Froome waits for his crown on a night for the sprinters Preview video and map of the course
- 520 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- 2011 winner cadel evans
- go any aussies!
- (and 4 more)
-
Old habits die hard. We are still far too boundary line conscious and seemed to ignore the corridor when it was obviously our best option. It's not like we were playing a good side and were forced wide. Brisbane were undermanned and we should have put them under a lot more pressure. We didn't and that's one of the reasons we lost the game. If we measured our performance against our efforts in the 1st half of the season then you could say we've gotten a lot better but we're still far too indirect. We need to take the game on a lot more and take more risks. The players often go wide as a first option and opposition teams know it. There is actually more room in the middle of the ground for our forward forays but our players up the ground continually lead to the boundary line. The 'safe' option ends up being the option with the most risk. We lost a game we could have won. Our overall effort and endeavour has improved dramatically but we create far too many out of bounds situations. That might be ok if we were good at stoppages and clearances but we are poor in both those areas. Our best chance is keeping the ball alive. If you've got your eye on our draft pick number and a possible priority pick then last nights loss maybe won't mean much. I believe we desperately need some wins to restore lost faith. Last night was a reasonable effort but we still lost.
-
Quintana wins stage 20! He claims 2nd overall along with the 'King of the Mountain' and the 'Best young rider'. Top performance. Rodriguez came 2nd in the stage to claim 3rd overall whilst Froome marked both riders to finish 3rd in the stage. Here's an audio podcast (10 mins) of last nights stage ... Froome all but secures the title For a comprehensive summary ... Quintana's coup... the arrival of a climbing king!
- 520 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- 2011 winner cadel evans
- go any aussies!
- (and 4 more)
-
Well the Tour is as good as over you'd reckon. Podium places are up for grabs and Quintana is almost sure to attack to gain outright 2nd spot. That would then make for an interesting stage tonight. All Froome has to do is track them in a reasonable fashion and he'll be the 'Tour de France' winner. They might still make him work for it. Stage 20 ... live coverage from the official site Jean Francois Pescheux's view ... One last throw of the dice Preview video and map of the course
-
You could mount an argument that Clarke will be the only batsmen in this current squad who will return to England in 2015 (yes, we're back in England in 2 years time, not 4) ... Cricket - future tours At some stage the selectors will have to bite the bullet and pick young batsmen with good techniques and temperament (big runs would be handy as well but the first 3 bits of criteria are very important) In the last 5 years we've been picking old blokes with good technique and temperament (North, Cowan, Rogers) or young blokes without good technique or temperament. (Hughes, Warner and Smith have technique issues whilst Khawaja and Shaun Marsh have temperament issues) The selectors need to identify the young batsmen with good technique and temperament and give them a good go at it. Doolan, Maddinson, Burns, Silk and Mitch Marsh could easily be given some opportunities. Obviously not all at once but over a period of 18 months to 2 years. There are no doubt others in the mix. The current batting line-up is taking us nowhere. Rogers is a good player but he's too old. Watson is not a test opener and might survive if his bowling holds up. Hughes, Warner, Khawaja and Smith (see above) and Cowan is too old. The only older player who stands out is Bailey (he adds badly needed leadership) One of our biggest issues is our batsmen's ability to play spin. Swann didn't bowl all that well last night but he picked up 5 wickets. He'll probably do much the same in the 2nd innings. As an aside, here are our batsmen from the '85 campaign. Wood Hilditch Wessels Border Welham Boon Ritchie Matthews and Phillips were used in the top 6 or 7 as well. We've been here before and it took Border, Simpson and a totally revamped batting line-up before we returned to power again.
-
Even though there was some heavy rain in the Alps, it was a fairly uneventful stage in a lot of ways (in terms of the GC classification) A little disappointing but the school of thought was that yesterday's stage (stage 18) took a lot out of the cyclists. Here's an audio podcast (6 minutes) of the stage with references to the stage being "Too much for everybody and so they don't play" ... Froome maintains advantage For a comprehensive summary ... Costa: up, down... and onward to victory (again)!
-
Two from Eric Burdon. The first with 'War' and the second with the 'Animals' ... Macca 13.5
-
Incredible isn't it. On it's own, this stage is like a stand alone event. Never mind that they've just completed 18 stages and have another tough day tomorrow. If anything really dramatic is going to happen, it may happen tonight. Porte in a lot of ways remains the key. If Froome is left on his own, he might crack. I understand that it's unlikely and if it was a few other past cyclists having such an unassailable lead, I'd probably be calling it now. Just got a feeling that there is a twist in the tail (that may happen tomorrow night by the way)
-
Well, Froome wasn't at his absolute best and at one stage he looked liked he might lose a bit of time. In the end he gained nearly a minute on Contador! Great viewing last night and Quintana could provide more than nuisance value over the next 2 nights. Will be fascinating to see how Porte goes tonight. He was great last night but if we remember back to the 2nd day in the Pyrenees as an example, he may have spent all his petrol tickets again ..... maybe Stage 19 ... live coverage from the official site Jean Francois Pescheux's view ... Is this the stage when a white jersey gets some red dots? Map of the course and video preview Not only is this a really tough stage but it's a long one time wise (according to the time schedules) The stage kicks off at 7pm and will finish at around about 1.00am. By the time the cyclists get to the start of the climb to the 'Col de la Croix Fry', there will be some very tired legs. I'm expecting a few surprises. That includes Froome either tracking every other contender, perhaps faltering or making a break of his own. Quintana and Contador would be expected to make their attacks again. Literally anything could happen.
-
I can remember the tour finishing off with 2 very tough stages in the past but never 3. I seem to remember the last 4 days generally consisting of 2 tough stages in the Alps followed by a tricky 'flat' stage and then the final stage into Paris. If I'm right then this is a bit of unknown territory for the cyclists. The Colombian Quintana and of course Contador come into proceedings. Kreuziger and Mollema are within striking distance. If Froome does win the tour he will have really earned it. By the end of the next 3 days we'll either be singing his praises or perhaps questioning him or his team. For what it's worth I reckon he'll hang on but wouldn't be surprised if he gets caught (how's that for your quintessential 2 bob each way!)
-
Stage 18 (part 1 of the 'Trilogy of Terror') ... live coverage from the official site Jean Francois Pescheux's view ... The answer? 42! Map of the course and video preview Thought I'd put the profiles of the next 3 stages up to give an idea of what's in store for the riders (and the fans) There are a total of 8 difficult climbs (6 long and 2 of a shorter distance) over the 3 days and each climb could be viewed as a 'mini stage'. There can be no faltering by the cyclists in contention and indeed any number of the GC riders can have a big day and gain lots of time on their rivals. Chris Froome will need to be at his best over the course of the next 3 days and he will need the support of his team (mainly Porte it can be supposed) Look for lots of random attacks ... bring it on ... 'The Trilogy of Terror'
-
Stage 17 ... live coverage from the official site Jean Francois Pescheux's view ... 32km can be a lot different to 33... Map of the course, video and preview
