Queanbeyan Demon

This . . . thanks @MurDoc516. I was initially inclined to say that I learnt SFA from the heavily staged interview. In fact I learned a lot. Totally delusion.

A small amount of cognitive dissonance here maybe?

I suspect he's managed by more than one person in his life. And that'll be the root cause of the problem.

You're at home and one with the universe here on 'Land @sue.

If we get Rachele and have to pay 250k a year for Trac to play elsewhere - we take it and run like hell. In partnership with Kosi, helps set us up for the next 10 years.

If you're Brisbane - just a couple of premierships.

What? And be like Snott? Goody had many shortcomings. But one of them was not making a complete [censored] wit of himself at every presa.

I would not want him anywhere near the place. His constant disingenuousness creates a weird cognitive dissonance. He wants to praise the winners, but at the same time undermines them. It’s a face-saving tactic: the narrative becomes “we were unlucky” instead of “we weren’t good enough.” To the outside world it just sounds like whinging. At the end of the day, Chris Scott just comes across as a very insecure control freak. He can’t admit weakness, because to him weakness equals vulnerability, and vulnerability equals loss of control. That’s why every presser after a loss has the same flavour: “Not taking anything away from the winners, but…” followed by a laundry list of factors outside Jeelong’s control. It’s his defence mechanism. If he ever just said “we weren’t good enough,” it would shatter the tightly wound self-image he’s built around control and superiority. It’s actually pretty revealing. To Jeelong supporters it sounds like leadership; to the rest of us it looks like a bloke terrified of admitting fallibility.

Absolutely. He can fill the 'role' created by the departure of . . .

Mark Neeld a stand out obviously.

Most content is incredible @BScotti.

I'm invoking the ghost of Jack Hamilton - can we send a 'please explain' to Richo?

Given he has admitted to not fulfilling his contractual obligations satisfactorily (i.e. position description), could we have our 800K back for 2026 please?

You're a classic Binman. I made a movie called 'Welcome to the Machine'. How prescient of you. And just by the way, your post has at least one non sequitur and one self-contradiction. So regardless of what i wrire or

Mods - please deal with this post in a manner befitting it's trauma triggering content. Recommend poster incurs exile to the Siberian Re-Education Camp, where they must endure endless replays of the 2010 drawn Grand Final until they renounce all empathy.

and what's with her hair do?

Um, actually I did the work myself Binman. It's far from the first time I've made these points on 'Land over the years. I note your cheap shot is unable to rebuke my claims - each of which are broadly acknowledged as true by my possie that actual knows about footy and how Melbourne have been screwed by successive VFL/AFL regimes over decades.

I could make a case that it's all BS. Brisbane: Merger Windfall and Father–Son GoldThe 1996 Fitzroy–Brisbane merger gave the Lions a once-only player infusion. While most of the Fitzroy list drifted away, Chris Johnson became a three-time premiership backman and Martin Pike, an ex-Fitzroy hard nut, was re-drafted to add grunt. More significantly, the father–son rules of the late 1990s and early 2000s handed Brisbane elite talent at minimal cost. Jonathan Brown was secured as a second-round father–son pick, Chris Scott and Brad Scott were recruited cheaply, and Alastair Lynch—brought in earlier under special concessions—rounded out the core. These concessions and bargains allowed Brisbane to stack its list around Michael Voss, Nigel Lappin, Simon Black, and Jason Akermanis, producing a dynasty that won three consecutive premierships (2001–2003) and appeared in four straight grand finals. In short, the AFL’s structures let Brisbane bank a generation of stars with little draft sacrifice. Geelong: Father–Son Dynasty BuildersOver the same 30-year period, Geelong mastered the father–son rule. They plucked Matthew Scarlett (pick 45), Gary Ablett Jr (pick 40), and Tom Hawkins (pick 41) with late selections that would never yield such talent in a normal draft. Each became a cornerstone of their premiership sides in 2007, 2009, 2011, and 2022. Alongside them, Jed Bews, Nathan Ablett, and others added depth. The Cats did not pay in trades or high picks; they simply exploited the AFL’s rules at the time, when rival clubs couldn’t bid up father–sons. By the time the bidding system tightened in 2015, Geelong had already built a dynasty. They later doubled down with bold trades (Dangerfield, Cameron, Smith), but the foundation came free of charge. Strategic Losing? The Draft Haul That Changed Hawthorn Forever The incentive existed and Horeforn clearly benefited from priority picks in that window. In the 2004 draft, Hawthorn held a priority pick (No.2) for Jarryd Roughead, then also took Lance Franklin (5) and Jordan Lewis (7)– a haul enabled by finishing 15th in 2004 (4–18) under the old priority-pick rules; in 2005 they again qualified and used a priority selection on Xavier Ellis in the 2005 draft. Public chatter has long alleged deliberate late-season under performance to secure those picks, but it remains speculation, not adjudicated tanking. ConclusionBetween Brisbane’s merger concessions and father–son coups, Geelong’s exploitation of the old father–son system and Horeforns 'strategic under performance, all three clubs assembled all-time lists at cut-rate prices. The result: four premierships each, built not just on good management but on systemic advantages few other clubs enjoyed. Call any of them “the best” and you’re ignoring the fact that the 21st century’s been less about three empires and more about three mob bosses taking turns running the joint.

I know facts are not de rigueur around here - but Trac averages exactly the same number of goals per game as Danger. Oh [censored], I forgot. Everything wrong at Melbourne is somehow Trac's fault.

Speak for yourself.

At least you now know that you're one poster who's worth reading.

this is right up there with Jack Dyer's - "Bartlett's, he's older than he's ever been before."

What are you talking about?

You don't expect Max to come running every time Louis spit the dummy?