Jump to content

Little Richard

Life Member
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Little Richard

  1. At best one and that's Trengove. Scully will never be a star.
  2. Let's not get too carried away yet, remember once upon a time it was 'Morton, Scully and Trengove who were going to be stars'. Let's not burden them with that tag yet.
  3. I think a positive we can take out of this match is that England's reliability on Anderson has really been exposed. Once he went off last night they couldn't buy a wicket. Finn has bowled terribly, Broad been up and down and not looking very dangerous for the most part and Swann was fairly ineffective, even on the last day. Now we just need our batsmen to master Anderson and stop getting themselves out and we'll be apples.
  4. It's amazing how the attitude towards him has changed so much in a few weeks. Just a few rounds ago people were calling him soft and some even saying he was another dudded pick. I didn't see the game Saturday but from all accounts he played very well and the stats show the same. Coming along very nicely I think.
  5. Absolute [censored]
  6. Australian Cricket - no batsmen, no worries! The tail enders might get it done.
  7. Stiff, great innings!
  8. This has been a great first couple of days, very entertaining. Hopefully it keeps up like this!
  9. What's the highest score by an 11 ever? Agar taking the pi$$ now, this is sensational. Great anchoring innings by Hughes too.
  10. Little Richard replied to jacey's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Maybe Stark could be a left field option if he can lift his game a bit? A small midfielder who can play forward.
  11. Little Richard replied to jacey's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I'd say Saad will definitely be a required player at the Saints, considering Milne may never play again and he regardless of his off field issues he is 33. Ben Warren (ex-North) has been doing very well in the VFL but I'm not sure if he is more of a lead up forward rather than the crumber we need.
  12. How is that comment biased? It's a pretty fair point that you can't tell 10 games into their respective careers who is going to end up the better player.
  13. Anyway, to get back on topic, I love Jimmy T.
  14. Scharenberg is a tall defender isn't he? Why on earth would we draft a tall back who has been nothing more than solid at the championships when we have the shitte$t midfield in the league? It's gotta be Dunstan for me, or if we manage to pick up another solid body in trade/FA Aish or Kelly.
  15. Would it? I hear his form has been quite strong... You never know, we might end up with pick 3?
  16. Though we needed an inside (Viney) and a highly skilled runner (Toump) in the last draft, let's not pass up on Luke Dunstan this draft plz.
  17. Don't worry, we got our Wines in Viney, whom I think will show himself to be a better player in time.
  18. I have to commend you for starting a POSITIVE thread about a new recruit, it doesn't happen often. You're spot on with your assessment I think and he'll be a very good player soon enough.
  19. Little Richard replied to 45HG's post in a topic in Other Sports
    On holiday in the US at the moment and saw the Mets/Yankees at Citi Field the other day. I was backing the Mets as I always back the underdog (probably should have gone for the more successful side) and surprisingly they won 2-1! It was pretty entertaining and some guy whose name I can't remember hit a nice homer.
  20. Haha, beauty!
  21. Little Richard replied to jabberwocky's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Stock standard to show the supporters they are aware i guess... doesn't really have any other purpose
  22. Little Richard replied to jabberwocky's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I spoke to a guy who claimed to be the cousin of Watts after the West Coast game and he said Watts has absolute faith in Neeld and his mates are all at the club... whether or not it was actually his cousin is very debatable.
  23. Little Richard replied to jabberwocky's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    He was gone a long time ago, mentally at least
  24. Little Richard replied to jabberwocky's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Since when was Watts disgruntled? I agree that he is a natural forward but he did have his best year to date last year in the back half.
  25. So.... who won?