demon3165

Sorry I apologise I thought it was you saying again sorry.

So you want a board to interfere with the football department and list management then, we have 2 home bases won a flag with them, as it has been mentioned before the club didn’t instigate these actions as for information that's your opinion not mine i don'tneed to be spoon-fed with info just to be happy, all I can say glad you are not on the board running the club.

We are not shareholders... A stakeholder is anyone who is impacted by a company or organization's decisions, regardless of whether they have ownership in that company. Shareholders are those who have partial ownership of a company because they have bought stock in it. All shareholders are stakeholders, but not all stakeholders are shareholders.

I have asked 2 people to provide facts about the board and got nothing, people go on heresy as fact or listen to the media and assume it's true, anyone just show facts.

Oh so the home base is on this board is it, at the moment we have 2 and won a premiership so let's see how caulfield works out, Lawrence brought this one on himself not the board as for the other not sure if that's still going, as for the media who cares the write what they want to write just remember we had one journo say people were leaving and those people resigned to the club.

If there are no challenges to the current board members during an election and are restanding or anyone filling a position then they are elected to the board unopposed.

As I have asked somebody else to do what are problems with the board, list them and explain why, not hearsay just facts please.

There will always be challengers and that's also a good thing, as for a review yes, but only for the football department and that's where it is needed.

And what gross failings are those, please list them with facts not hearsay?

Doesn't this clown understand he was rejected by members, just give it up....it's now an ego thing for him.

So inform us what they have done wrong in detail so people can discuss it? Facts only please..

I might add I sent an email to the club about this, but I expect they would have seen the same thing I hope....

If you watch it in slow motion Kossie's foot gets hit by Moore's knee which forces Kossie off balance, this then causes the collision, so in fact Mooe helped the collision to happen.

Now I'm one who doesn't winge about umpires or MRV but 3 games for that, Moore went to ground nearly the same time as he came through there is know why he expected More to drop lower what a joke, I expect the club to appeal.

No need to run to the media's drum when he's ready he will talk.

lmfao, ok believe that it's ok....

Good saves my breath then.

Maybe he's not ready to front the press and even if he wanted to go they should make a stand don't trade him till Tasmania come in full stop but I don't think that's the case.

And if my auntie had balls she would be my uncle, does not excuse skill, football awareness an ability to man up stick tackles make all the excuses you want because if we continue down the same path kiss next year away and we will be doing a North and Hawks path quicker than you think, and if one really thinks about it giving Viney and Gawn extensions when there was no need to was just a solidarity feel about it.

Oh so one game he was in the midfield twice another for one game and played against GC and you call that a midfield role?

They had a lot of injuries as well at different times and that didn't help them.

For starters get JVR out of the ruck position and teach him to mark.

And now people see it, signs were there in 23,23 and now 24 will now be interesting to see what the club does now.

Unlike others not disappointed losing Nibler, great clubman, played a role good luck to him.