Jump to content

monoccular

Members
  • Posts

    17,082
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by monoccular

  1. 🤔 We should have learned from Sam Weideman - lovely guy, trains hard, but just zero aggression.
  2. Thanks for that summary. A smoky who I have totally forgotten about was Sestan. From what little I have seen of him (TV only) and heard he seems an excitement machine if he develops AFL level fitness. Another medium 188cm forward but with just a bit of a difference. May take another year but worth keeping an eye on. GO DEES
  3. Integrity and AFL in the same paragraph? Interesting. Ouch! That worked out really well in both our finals, didn’t it? North made PF what, 7 years ago, and have mismanaged their list. How do they qualify for special assistance?
  4. Perhaps that is exactly why McAdam prefers to play under the apprentice than under Burgess. Clarry was allowed time (frustrating as hell to him and to us) to recover; McAdam was, or feels he was, forced along too quickly and reinsured.
  5. Like father, like son. Looking forward to seeing a lot more of him over the coming years. IMVHO he would have been a far better sub that the ones we selected in both finals.
  6. Do we know which umpires awarded votes at all? Is it a consensus, or maybe they decide that one will do the votes this week, another next week. Maybe it is the senior one? Sure as hell #22 wouldn’t offer any to a Demon.
  7. There are a few dynamics with our mid forward connection Did you mean a few dynamics, or few dynamics? Stephan King - are you referring to Jeff White’s assailant, or the author?
  8. Of course no conflicts of interest anywhere in the AFL - nor in their partners, Sportsbet. And the votes are kept in a locked box and nobody has any idea about who is in the lead, especially the appeals board late 2022 - 🙄🙄🙄
  9. Just a question about linguistics - or perhaps semantics Can an opinion actually be wrong, or can it only be unfounded or unsupported or unpopular? It is after all personal and founded on one’s own perceptions on an issue?
  10. Norm Smith did ok coaching from the bench (in his gabardine overcoat) 🤗❤️💙 Wodja - just warning you - you are not alone 🤗 Seriously I would seriously consider not following the club I have loved for 70 odd years.
  11. Maybe they could take each other out?
  12. Looking forward to thug Zorko KOing Maynard at the 3 minute mark - in a football action of course.
  13. But “so brave”. Didn’t hear that about us last year.
  14. So maybe the maggots actually are incompetent rather than corrupt? Though of course, there are live margin bets 🙄
  15. Gil will never allow that.
  16. Cripps 💩himself there. Now commentators saying how brave he is playing with a serious injury.
  17. Unless you go for Carlton ✔️
  18. Bloody hell. Dumb Joe pulled right out of marking contest in full view of maggots - play on. Corruption runs on. Has Gil worded up the umpires for next week - “Magpies must win”. ?
  19. Unless you go for Carlton ✔️
  20. You don’t have to see it mate 2 options - don’t go - pluck your eyes out Maynard and Cox clashing heads at training Thursday with concussion? Even though it was firmer than KiZies. ✔️ Could we take one (or a few) of their players instead. #23 for starters.
  21. Gil will be grinning. GO LIONS.
  22. Toby - one meter short. FMD - Pies are going to win this
  23. Jessie !!! Please come home - the G is a great place to play. 1 bloody point - OMG But only 6 minutes for a footy action concussion for Maynard.
  24. Yet another high tackle ignored. Thank$ Gil
  25. Ankle tackling apparently in the new rule book
×
×
  • Create New...