monoccular

Given that Tom has had to play forward with Jesse's numerous outages, and will unfortunately probably have to continue to do so, we don't have another option. Yes of course we should look at Lever, but do we have enough to offer for him?

Presumably the maggot involved was sent to Manangatang seconds the next week.

Will withold comments until we play the ?

Schmuk is so conflicted: prejudging and preempting the MRP as an AFL employee. Mark my words - Danger is in no danger.

I hope that KC or Plapp can give an answer - is Gus genuinely pressing for senior selection and if so how soon? Next week particularly given yesterday's poor game

against a team that has b en tanking, yes we should have won and won well. Especially with a gale in the last quarter. What, 2 goals in the second half? Premiers don't do that. Feel proud of yourself, Bernie? Your ill discipline let us all down, especially your team mates.

Angus pressing ?????

So was JKH or ANB NBG?? Havent had a chance to see the game

I think the complaint is not the penalty in Zorko's case but the blatant inconsistency and in fact favoritism by the MRP Ironic isn't it the Dangerfield was the "victim" in the AFL index case against Trengove**, and now is the assailant who will get off either free or with a wet lettuce. **Three weeks for MFC's Jack Trengove as I recall.

No

No, but we have only one flag since he bit the Dallas dust ?

== dill Gil thought bubble

Not damn likely given that he spent his time at Richmond and at EssUndone.

Whilst Scott's head exploding, finally, would be a joyous sight, a massive (think our 1986 first final since 1964 v North, played in the wet, and a massive win) percentage boosting win How about they don't get it down to him. IF he does grab a few, I guess the Oscar bashers will have a field day

Winning even narrowly is far better than losing: we aren't used to repeatedly winning. And our manic game style is hard to sustain over 4 quarters. Just learning to keep winning, then learn how to crush. That said, I sincerely hope that we can dominate and crush Norf this weekend.

I wouldn't put it past the cheating bastards to suddenly find "documentary evidence" that only Hibbert and Melksham took "the good stuff" and that Jab took vitamin C.

Well seriously why would one broadcast a Norf home game before 55 spectators?

I take your point, this is how it should be, but the fact is that Rancid and selected others get away with it repeatedly.

Sure, I agree he was hit and his reaction (this time) may have been appropriate. But he has history. But what really pi55e5 me off about him is his recurrent sneaky sniping: quite apart from the serious assault on Watts last year, which the AFL didn't punish half severely enough*, he also regularly jabs opponents in the guts, something that the hypocritical folk at AFL HQ, lead by their weak kneed CEO, said they would address but haven't. [I guess they are waiting for someone in red and blue like Lewis or Vince to do it - then watch the clampdown]. *I have said it before and will say it again, elbows to the back of the head can and do result in extremely serious injury, or worse. It would be truly tragic if they were to wait for a "Phil Hughes moment" before they really clamped down on this low act. But they lack the leadership to do so. Pity.

...and then downgraded to 1 as they are due to play us. What is the betting it will be deemed accidental, low. contact, low impact? And Rance's sneaky jab to Stevie J's guts - low impact, low contact, no case to answer.

or remembered the golden AFL rule, look after Collingwood.

Shhhhhhh! Despite the glaring 'evidence' re North, Carlton (yet again) this's year and Freo last year and this the AFL "Integrity Unit" ????will no doubt fine us and take away draft pics from us but ignore those other breaches.

How many times have you made this point, basil? Getting rather tedious, frankly. Didn't look like a duck to me - a clumsy tackle. And I hope he carries on the same way when Selwood, or his new disciple in ducking, Paddy, does it in his tackle.

On the day.....maybe??? But looking ahead.......no. The Egyptian Tourist Board does well out of one.

Ah. This week did they decide "to do it for Bucks?" Whereas other weeks....... It actually means a lot for Collingwood - it means they will be stuck with the current coach indefinitely ? Please explain ? Haven't they lost quite a few over there including against us?