Bitter but optimistic

Sometimes that's the best way for all concerned.

Crikey Ernie, now you've done it! You just made me tear up. My bacon, egg and quadruple pancake sandwich is ruined. Shame on you.

What if Max spews on him?

Mav "strabismus" Weller - love him! Great photo potential.

Glad you're back on this thread Ernie. Now you can tell me ( in total privacy of course) the filthy details about your "open marriage" experiences. As you're dead you can't be sued, so cut loose.

It means you're f....d dc !

We should have a poll on that dc.

I reckon this rule change could produce some interesting plays. Once the fullback leaves the goal square, I presume it is a normal play on situation. Does he then have to kick or can he handball? I just picture a play where another defender is positioned to sprint in to take a handball while the defender guarding the square is wrong footed. Possible?

Some lurid details please Ernie.

Nah ! Even lawyers would have better things to do …………………………………………… surely?

A Phd at the very least I would think dc. However, who would be interested in reading about lawyers?

Imagine the excitement that must be building among the pieshop fraternity in Melbourne.

Given the rate that the Jesse Hogan thread is rollicking along it will overtake this one before long. Redleg would be well and truly f....d then!

I'm going to stop reading this thread - it is seriously [censored] up my head space!

Bring your own fried ( or baked, fricasseed, boiled etc etc) frog.

I've encountered some wonderfully aromatic cream cheeses. In the most unlikely circumstances, I might add.

Exactly Gnasher! This was the point I was getting at with my above post. The have extended the goal square by stealth.

No change to the goalsquare but the man on the mark has to stand a further 5 metres back and the fullback can play on without kicking to himself. Will be interesting - a sharp footed kicker in might lob one in the forward line. There will some new set plays developed over the summer

Keep potting him Chook.

What's a "tele prompter" ? Is it some sort of technological teaser pony ?

Bah!! Shylock.

"PEDO" !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! What a gun!!!! Loved him!!!!!!!!!!!!

You know Red, I've been reflecting on this and you maybe correct. There are some unresolved matters - - The misunderstanding over the neighbour's missus. - The unfortunate accident with "The Lads" and another neighbour's prized orchids - And the ridiculous claim that I set the dog on children last Halloween - Most recently, there is the disgruntled former maid who asserts that that certain duties I required were beyond her ( or any reasonable persons) contractual obligations. A lot of fuss over nothing really but perhaps you could tidy them up for me. As you can understand, the "readies" are currently a bit short at The Manor so I'm sure a pro bono arrangement for a fellow denizen of this thread could be arranged.

It's all hypothetical at this moment 'lad ! Although some of the posts I've read seem more like hypofantasy.

Let me know if Stuie sneaks back under another name.