beelzebub

its right up there with "dog ate my homework " isn't it...lol

I think WADA should go for top whack.. 2 years less time served.. thats just me though

did she bother to enquire about the many other 'exotics' on the form ?

This is the case most likely. The AFL dont want to do ANYTHING ..nada... luckily they don't have to..ASADA will and they won't be forgetting the errors of their first go at this . Asada need to show they are made of the right stuff again. They'll have everyone else involved ( other than the players ) in their sights now

there is that..lol There were probably a few who made a discovery in relative secrecy then feigned some or other to stay aside from the 'program'. But I suspect they stayed 'mum' on it. Every other player who did go along had the opportunity to investigate . That they haven't/didn't or chose not to worry is their own foolhardiness and they can cop the ban for it now.

Is a big year for the MFC

They're cooked

boggles the mind eh ?

There's context

the obligation is to seek fact. They sought concord. They sought some sort of consideration. They were their own fools. Stuff them.Don't give me this peer shlt etc. Where were the fukked up doey eyed parents the numnuts ? The rule? Common sense...surely

The players are as much to fault. They are the ones initially advantaged and the the team. bugger the stupid idiots and pillory those that used them.

this ^^^^

want to put a beer on that Old ?

Theres either...No significant fault....or it's THEIR fault. Can't be a little pregnant nor a little dead. Either are...or not. They're at fault. Many factors about that but they are.

wants to be a bloody good plan ...because they are getting smacked on the bum...( the 34 ) count on it... And if the contingency doesnt stack up so should any clubs officaldom for doing such a dumb thing.

no significant fault is bullshlt.. Thats the Essendon line of argument.. ironic no ?? Its beholding upon the individual.. ignorance is no excuse either in law...or the WADA code

no they wont Red. what co-operation...they stalled ..were party to the proceeding that stalled...Only when CORNERED have they done ANYTHING. Only time served is voluntary suspension of about 4-half months...thats all they get off.

Jack.. its always been my thinking that the AFL and the Clubs alike are caught in their own vortex of "she'll be right".There seems a groupthink that fails to understand what the Code and Asada/Wada are really about. It borders on the dismissive. Doesn't surprise me it was based on such ad ice as it was the only plausible reason it would go ahead. Shows we still have some dumb as dogshlt advisors at the club as well as ppl prepared to accept it. This is a black mark on this club if this is the case. Gump has it....stupid is as stupid does. Taking Milkshake was just stupid.

Theyll get 2 years minus time served. Thats approx 19+half months starting from when judgement given.Takes them out until end of season 2017 all but. Thays always been my opinion.

certainly Essendon. ..they DID it.The afl must take some blame for how the debacle panned out though.

How are we going to fit everyone on the paddock ? Lol

Watts>>>Where ?>>>>When ?

his Pa is mates with Ron....thick plottens

Jump on board the Jack Watts discussion :

A good question.. until we see them line up, hard to know I think Weed has played a lot at FF but he just calls himself a kpp. Im sure the club has plans..