beelzebub

She not a journalists little toe... Shes a shoddy fiction writer. Worthy of a new idea competition...almost !!

lol

the Aged has gone a bit quiet on the subject I wonder how long fairfax will last until it disappears up itself !!

Who's Bob ?....is he Bill's mate ?

his autobiography for starters lol

The thick plottens yet again. More going on here than a Christie novel.

Is Don Is Good Watch the witch whine Nice to see the club fending off and jabbing. Must be getting very close to stumps i'd say

Choice !!

the problem in reality is that there is essentially TWO "tanking's" One.. a coloquial reference to what is in reality List management whereby a team , coach etc looks beyond the immediate game and plans/acts on behalf of the longer term benefit. Then there's TWO.. TANKING ...Some mythical trangression supposedly enacted against a code of sport, in this instance AFL. Problem being there is actually no such thing as its not defined. Therefore it CANT exist. Now some here( and elsewhere ) would have us charged with the second on the basis of the first. Thats where they are unfounded and simply wrong.. try as they might these Alchemists are flawed in logic ( or simply have none )

dont tell Kerro that !! sheesh !!!

Richmond tanked ( well we didnt try to win )-Wallace

Far too late for that. we can see her for exactly what she is.

I wouldnt be adverse to such

last time i looked the rules were written by us.. No club has the absolute history we have of this game. The halycon days and the greatest growth of the sport occurred when we were its power. The MCG is only the MCG because of US.. others play there but they didnt create its aura.( in a football sense ) This is actually a very defining moment for the club. This is when we need to remind the AFL they are their for US..and the other clubs..not by their good grace.

Only because feint hearts like you want others to buy into that. we're about as expendable in this game as air. WE ARE THIS GAME...can you get that through your head ??

as what ?? oh yeah , that limp wristed easy beat over there.. theyre pushovers, gutless, spineless and plain fools. id rather not thank you !

I think many are confusing two aspects to all this. On one hand there is the idea of WANTING to go to court. The other is the PREPAREDNESS to go to court if need be. Whilst no one in their right mind particularly wants to go to court, other than beaks and sharks, one needs your adversary to understand you will if no agreeable solutions present. In my mind the club should stick firm with the attitude that you, AFL , created this f'n mess. You fix it,no cost to us. Or...... Im not blind to realities etc but neither do i see a need for us (esp alone) to be the patsy. The AFL is stretched. Now is not the time to cave,buckle or even blink. Everyone will judge the club on this , the endgame, from members to media to corporate interests as well as those who can impose legalities. This is our Waterloo, Trafalgar and Normandy....all rolled into one. We either will swim or sink on the outcome. David won; he was clever, lateral and unerringly steadfast. As we must be.

Am done with the "what ifs" etc. Will just wait for the "actual" Can't be too long now. I have faith.

Wheels on the bus go round and round..

What Red is saying,I believe, is what others did, and the condonment by the powers that be,, go to context and precedent. Defense rests your honour !

Brock's probably quite fond of a Malt-house !!

they were an off the cuff joke. Dumb is to give any weight to it.How mank kilos shall I put you down for .?

That,and some want he and his mate gone !

i took it that Don McL had. So he must

So you BH , just as anonymous , question the legitmacy of members ( as the majority ofus here are ) wanting a club thst espouses an ethos that seeks to stand behind the individual ? Yes it always different and harder for the one with finger on button and butt to the wind. But right is right. Gutless is Gutless .