Jump to content

whatwhat say what

Life Member
  • Posts

    15,184
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Posts posted by whatwhat say what

  1. I'm biased as I work on it, but I would say absolutely.

    $90 gets you 12 months subscription. Quality is good.

    There's been teething issues with the stats modules which have impacted upon the streaming by for he most part it works well.

    I'm watching on my android tablet currently and it's going we'll.

  2. I've never understood why Strauss has been persevered with a defender - he doesn't defend with any really intensity.

    Is it possible he could play on the wing? Or is he not quick enough?

    I've never rated him and I have no expectations for his future, so I am assuming that he will continue to be a good player at this level.

    It's a real shame when you look at those drafted around him and significantly after him that he simply doesn't compare in terms of the attributes that they bring to the side.

    • Like 1
  3. Posted by Vida on 'ology, fair point:

    "We have sufficient concerns about an identified breakdown in reporting protocols that we believe it is appropriate that Dr Bates stands aside until these matters are further investigated," McLardy said.

    If that's the case then how can they say with confidence that;

    Every supplement included in the Club’s supplement regime is approved by the Club Doctor and is in accordance with all ASADA and WADA guidelines

    scarily true.

    the board has to go. their position is untenable.

  4. the fact that the football department didn't know what the doctor was doing is a major concern. the issue of whether or not dank met anyone else other than the doctor is a question that must be answered

    what contact did he have with the players?

    communication through all levels of the club is unfathomable that it could be so...non-existent.

    the whole place needs gutting.

    through this we must hope for rebirth.

    ultimately, we are the club who invented the game. does the afl have a duty to protect us (from ourselves)?

  5. the response by the club is fine, however it's not the drugs (supplements, vitamins, whatever) that's at the crux of the issue here - it's the blatant LYING of the club in regards to dank's involvement with the club!

    if the dees' admin can't understand that they've mislead their members, fans, the general public and perhaps most importantly the afl investigative staff then they're even more moronic than would seem possible.

    we're absolutely going to be cooked over this.

    it could well end up with the afl running the club - god knows we need someone who knows what the blazes they're doing as it's quite clear that our board, admin and football department have no idea whatsoever.

    • Like 4
×
×
  • Create New...