H_T

Crikey WYL, good for you. You've actually said something of substance. Pop the champagne ! I'm tipping you're from the milky way. PS. Still waiting on who you would replace for Hussey. And your own Australian XI side. You're awfully selective on what you intend to reply to. I won't say too much more because I really want you to focus on this task I'm setting you. If time permits give good reason as to "why" for your replacement with maybe some stats to support this. Cheers. In the meantime, I'll do mine and get back soon enough.

So you've got White for North ? Is that right ? Smith for Hauritz ? Still waiting for your replacement on "list clogger" Hussey ? This will be interesting... better still name your starting Australian XI for us ?

No, I'm not. You're conveniently trying to twist things around and put words in my mouth. I've said previously at different times that these 3 guys might becoming to the end of their tether through poor form. Particularly North, quite a few times. When I have stated this I have put forward a possible replacement or different alternative line-up at different instances. On the flipside you really haven't. (Apart from the Smith-Hauritz case). So fess up and provide your solutions (name replacements) and give your reasoning. Ask your buddy Chappell. According to you, he's been in the hotseat long enough, hasn't he ?

You provide as much spin as Warne did with his flipper. You can call them list cloggers if you want. But when they're taking wickets or making runs they're contributing. List cloggers I presume are ones who can't get a look in the senior side, yet take spots on the list. My point is that if you're selected in the Australian XI you're not a list clogger, you're doing a job and contributing with bat or ball. In this case in India they haven't (or in Hauritz's case anyway), but they are a part of a team. Guys like Daniel Bell of Melbourne, couldn't get a game, yet remained on the list. See the difference hotshot ? I really don't want to spoon feed again. Ok precious ? WYL, you still haven't answered RR's question^. I'm not surprised. We're all used to it. You've named Smith for Hauritz but that is it. As 45HG16 stated, how about a little research to support your call for these "list cloggers" of yours.... As for your reference to people on this thread being a little precious re: the Australian XI..I think there is plenty of examples on this thread of 39 pages to argue that. I'll let you read.

You'd know. "List cloggers"....FMD. They're not playing at Casey WYL. They're representing Australia. This on the back of your statement in another thread that Davey is "now a senior player." The mind boggles. You are in fine form, aren't you...or I should say true to form. Ricky Ponting needs to take at least some ownership as captain on the back of his reply to the criticism from Warnie's 'tweet' re: field placings for Hauritz's bowling. Ponting claimed that Hauritz sets the field to his own bowling and that Warne should get his facts right. Maybe Warne was speaking out of school. But I reckon as a spin bowler with the record he has got, he must know something. Captains should be liasing with their bowler's and help setting the field. I would be surprised, very surprised, if Ricky didn't have one say or one contribution re: the field placings for Nathan Hauritz's bowling. And staggered, that Hauritz would bowl to his own set fields without any input from Ricky. I think as a captain, you need to know plans (field placings) for certain batsmen for all of your bowlers. Sure, we're not part of the inner sanctum and it may well be that Hauritz can do whatever he pleases. But I would be absolutely dumb founded if that were in fact the case. That said, after Hauritz got pummelled, Ricky did the right thing in taking him off. And Warne should keep things like that to himself or speak to Ricky behind the scenes and not air them publicly if he had any concern. It's the last thing Ricky needs. Poor form by Warnie, and it's pleasing to see Warne still making yards with his phone (iphone ?).

Bullsh!t WYL. You said "so much for GS Chappell making a difference !" You make silly statements, get caught out, and then try and talk your way out of it with petty diversional garbage.

Stop talking such utter tripe WYL. The side was already selected for India. GS Chappelli has just come in. The ink has barely dried, and you're trash talking him ! Give him a break.

The ink is still drying FCS.

Just prolongs the pain and puts off the development of other(s) on the international stage within the Test arena.

Indeed. Ponting had no faith in Hauritz by giving the ball to North. I know the Test was close RR and they may not make a change here. But with the Ashes approaching they need enthusiasm and they should put Smith in for Hauritz! I still cannot believe North is in, I called for him to be dropped prior to NZ tour. They needed to make changes back then. I like Paine at the moment. I think he should be perservered with. Chappell should have some serious input at the selection table. Go for youth Chapelli. FCS.

The Redbacks are still a show.

No such luck

Kicked a nice goal at a crucial time when the Bullants were coming.

Certainly impressed me. Moves like Stephen Hill.

Feel the same way. Certainly frustrating as an avid participant and fan of Cricket.

Indeed ! RR, I think harsh penalties should be implemented and actioned immediately by the ICC. But their inaction record suggests otherwise, so I'm not holding my breath. And if so fraudulent behaviour has been verified, perhaps imprisonment should follow. I heard Malcolm Speed suggest this yesterday after he referred to the outcomes from the Cronje, Azhuriddin ?(spell) cases.

Spot on 45. The last 48 hrs has been quite revealing.

Fixed ?

Good call. Get on the Aussies people.

Heard that Arsenal was no longer interested in Mark Schwarzer. PS. Btw, your PM box must be full. Tried to send you a PM re: report. It won't accept.

A sure sign WYL would have batted first.

What the ? I don't like this idea. Sending a batsman in for the second time. A sure sign things are in trouble.

Absolutely. Her kick serve is nearly the best in the game. It has troubled all her opponents and is most effective on the clay surface. It will suit her at Wimbledon too.

You're right titan, I was of the same opinion. Playing darts with a group of mates last night - no-one gave her a chance of beating Jankovic. Couldn't believe it. Most thought she had just played her "Grand Final" beating Serena. As she one, she didn't carry on - that's a sign of the 'work is not done yet.' Played magnificent tennis did Stosur, defeating Jankovic in straight sets in a most dominant display. I think she will win the title (oops - I hope I haven't mozzed her). Samantha Stosur. Well done ! But one more ! Then Wimbledon !

Awesome performance by Samantha Stosur defeating Serena Williams in three sets. 8-6 in the third and final set. Will gain great confidence. The first time she has beaten a World No.1. Now for Jelena Jankovic in the SEMI-FINAL. Many junior tennis kids could look at Stosur for inspiration. Her hard work & determination has got her into this position. At 26, she has a few good years ahead of her in tennis. Just the kick Australian Women's Tennis has been craving.