daisycutter

that tough, huh?

apparently they have said this

agreed, absolutely not a dive he may have (stress 'may') milked it a little bit, but it was all initiated by mitchell and a straight shoulder charge to the chest when clarrie was not braced and miles off the ball. if dorks have a problem it should be with mitchell for a stupid lack of control. a free kick every time in my book

perfectly legal if you are not profiteering and you'd have no problem doing it thru demonland and ensuring it goes to a demon

plus 3 cups of coffee for the privilege of printing your own ticket on your own printer, old chap. yes, all small change but then multiply that small change by a very large number it's big gravy and i'd call a consumer choice of 1 a monopoly

fixed it for ya

if that happened tmac could follow mcgovern and fritsch could take the forward marking role

and given ticketek probably get a % of gf ticket value they are getting a bonanza anyway looking a gf ticket prices but as you say, open your books and then we will know, if not lets threaten a royal commission - lol noticed dick smith on telly tonight having a go at multinational ita's (internet travel agencies) and how they are gouging the hotel industry now upping their charges to 35% of booking value.......and then there is uber eats....not to mention tax avoidance

and who is to say the extra player was purely accidental and not deliberate? after all if it was deliberate then it's not unrealistic for a perp to claim it was accidental just saying

and anyway isn't it ultimately up to the player to agree to be a father/son draft nominee

our forward line accuracy and efficiency certainly didn't take a backward step, instead very much the opposite so down in one area but more than compensated by being up in another area what's to hate about a 34 point win against a top 4 side......fmd some people just like to grizzle

2 problems could arise here, jack 1. how do we know the exact time the extra player was on the ground - you may or you may not 2. how do we know the potential scoring impact during this period. i.e. an extra defender could have prevented a possible score to the offended team. likewise an extra mid could have too......etc etc etc.... all dynamics changed. penalty has to be more than just the score of the offending side during time of extra player

if it had been done by a captain's call for a count..... then.....how would the umpire (on the spot) necessarily know how long the extra player was on the ground and even if he did what had been scored. remember this would be in real-time so....the only option that makes sense in this scenario is to wipe the whole score of the offending team. this is what happens in most other jurisdictions if decided after the game the afl at least has precedents to alter the final outcome of a game and i don't see a problem as long as it is just and fair it matters not a whit whether it was intentional or not

i think the default is to erase the total score. there is often no way for the umpire on the spot to determine the duration of extra player and score for duration if the captain called for a count and the count was > 18 then i think the umpire has no option but to scrub the WHOLE score (for that team), then continue game

if north adelaide had any integrity they would declare themselves guilty and concede the game to woodville the decision by the one man tribunal was pathetic and gutless. replay the game - laughable norwood should refuse to participate in the grand final woodville should take out an injunction

has he accepted or will appeal?

to late, special robert pounced

if they had your mobile phone no they would have also sent you a text message. i got both (text and email)

i love it #adoptadocker this could go viral

heard on radio that someone has added an extra flight on friday too

expect vanders will get one soon

how about woewodin's run and bounce goal starting deep in the backline, virtually straight thru the corridor

well for starters, the mcc and afl members must be a big figure then you have the corporates etc

am i right in thinking that you can't specify a preferred category in the ballot? i.e. if you wanted standing room you couldn't nominate and could end up with category 1

definitely favoured the filth