daisycutter

i did say let's look at where bb (t20) is another 10 years or so. like i said odi was hugely popular in its initial years too. made for tv stuff usually has a use by date. even big brother didn't last (thank god) LOL

well the aflx teams aren't even based on city. seemingly no logic there in their team 'affiliations'. still think soo would be better than current choices. i also get the feeling bb is starting to wane. i now hear more complaints and disinterest than before. Will be interesting to see where bb (t20) is in another 10 years or so. Too many millionaire 2nd and 3rd rate cricketers playing bad cricket. I remember when ODI took off and what a revelation the 'short form' was and how popular. Now it's a mere shadow of itself. there are already new cricket formats (shorter than t20) being rolled out. cricket seems to be burning the candle at both ends and leaving both the worse off. if i was the afl i wouldn't be looking at cricket australia for inspiration. it's all just an opinion, macca, and i'm not against positive changes at all, but the afl don't seem to be making much of a fist with aflx and doing an even worse job trying to spin it. it reeks of over-reaching by over-paid afl executives who like to revel in the limelight

well no-one is suggesting the sky is falling, macca and i did make a positive suggestion that it could have been differentiated by state of origin (even with marvel themed logos) instead of the nonsense teams they come up with i'm yet to meet many people young or old who are excited yet alone even slightly 'aroused'

it may be typical afl misguided blundering, nc, but it really is just more of the afl bottom-line exploitation of anything. some might even call it virtue signalling. why they didn't just make it a state of origin i can't fathom - vic, sa, wa, rest

tear up or tear up? or both?

wow, he's nearly as fat as fatracca ?

now we train the whole damn city down

ernie, demonland is a group of exceptions (mfc supporters) who are also exceptionally talented, and when they lapse with bad spellink and grummer they must be immediately called-out and remediated. Standards must be upheld regardless of place of abode.

nice to see your mfcss is in remission, ethan. that's modern footy technology for you

on forum thread list click solid v to right of your name (top rhs of screen) select ignore list in drop down

what dark days?

You should always listen to your mum, didi, it's not too late ? ......well, you did walk straight into it......

nuff said

non-binary?

and cp5 can be christian fatracca

new nick for tom? - tomatoe

toetally agree

let's hope 2019 is the year of #freekickdemons

#11096

that sounds like the very essence of a 'judgement', ernie

you may well be right, rjay

one too can always find examples of players who reduced a bit of weight and improved their games cherry picking the odd example to prove one's pov proves nothing frankly the whole question is not that big a deal for me. i just thought it worthwhile exploring because it looks a bit of an outlier in today's modern game (not tony lockett's era) where a percentage point here and there can make a difference worth pursuing

i'd agree with you if we were discussing nrl ? i'm reasonably happy with tracc's progress and prospects. I'm not saying outright that 96kg (if true) is too much for him. I just don't know, but it does suggest to me that it's possibly a small concern worth exploring and discussing

well we are "arguing" about his weight based on figures that are a year old for all we know until we get some current verifiable data it is somewhat meaningless i tend to agree that if he was in fact 96kg then at least on the surface this would seem sub-optimal (imho)