daisycutter

sounds like an afl football club - lol

it's not even the crumby bits, just the empty plastic bag

i'm sure uncle's croquet court at the manor would be suitable for an mcg sized ground

that's ok i can ditch the gorgo, as long as they don't tax my pecorino romano

so you can now buy pick 7 for $1.6M well done afl and equalisation

uncle, the afl probably have shares in a law firm as a means of hedging their exposure and i stopped buying a record long time ago and now bring my own hip flask and diy cheese platter

an all lawyer panel means this could go on for another 2 years.....lol

according to cornes, yes 🤣 so it must be true as he doesn't like lies

you'd think so......they must be on shaky ground esp barham

hope there are no practising catholics or muslims on the board or the executive could be a blood bath

what point value? they don't yet even have a pick number, just a range

i've always been under the impression that essendrugs had a very strong catholic following on that basis seems a good fit 😂

anybody (other than criminals and low-life) doesn't seem right in the red sash

and i'd add uncle's manor to the list

you'll probably have to fight off luci, but i'd back-in the ranga any day assuming luci is not a ranga

you could always run away with him to perth, wcw and it's closer to poland too 🤣

#37 in rookie draft 2017. that's pretty much a free hit. and we had all the inside info, or should have had definitely one we let through to the keeper

but the hwfua deal was completely different in many ways. there was no trading with gws at all

my microwave has a 12hr digital clock with no am/pm indicator in the other hand 24 hour analog clocks do exist

well it was hawthorn in good faith (presumably) who initiated the review and got egan to talk to the families and gave them an opportunity to talk after 9 years and air any grievances. so your telling me that after waiting 9 years to talk they couldn't wait a week for the afl and hawthorn to respond with a process to address what was very serious matters. now, after participating willingly in hawthorn's review they didn't want to wait for hawthorn or afl's response before going to the media. well it's all water under the bridge now and it is what it is, but i can understand the accused's feeling they have not been afforded a fair process (up to now) because of the families involvement of the press and being explicitly named whilst the accusers have not been.

we have a different opinion then on this aspect i think the families could have at least waited for hawthorn's response before going to the court of public opinion. and if that response was unsatisfactory then talk to the press. but that's just my opinion. i'll just wait until both sides have had their say and had it evaluated and tested. looks like it could be a looong wait.

it's not as simple as that, and i think you know that the 3 hawthorn coaches were effectively ambushed by press deadlines and lack of full understanding. any decent lawyer's advice would be to say nothing at that stage, and certainly not initially to the press who hold no authority in the matter

think he's imagining more porko zorko 🤣

i wouldn't have a clue, uncle. seizing of "records" is just a sort of catch-all starting point should keep a few dozen bureaucrats busy for months, sifting, sifting

well just for one example, uncle i'd expect a dump of all historic emails from the period in question from the club's email server. and then there would be minutes from board meetings and minutes from any other relevant meetings from same period. and employment records of who was present in the club (players and employees) at same period. etc etc