Agreed, but satisfying GWS doesn't stop GCS from forcing us to use first round pick on Viney.
If you are going to come up with a "deal" you should also include a GCS "deal"
Unless of course you believe we will finish below GCS
And, of course it depends on what sort of 17yo we are talking about. If he is likely to be a ready-to-play type when eligible then that is better than if he is the type who will take years to develop. We need good players able to play quickly, not in 3-4 years.
Edit: missed olisiks inclusion of a "deal" for GCS - that looks better